My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 28 - Public Hearing - ZOA No. 20204-01 South Coast Technology Center
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
08/06/2024
>
Item 28 - Public Hearing - ZOA No. 20204-01 South Coast Technology Center
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2024 9:17:46 AM
Creation date
8/6/2024 8:50:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
28
Date
8/6/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
591
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SECTION II <br />ta <br />www.FinanceDTA.com <br />INTRODUCTION <br />First, based on more than 30 years of preparing fiscal impact studies and performing peer <br />reviews of similar studies prepared by other consulting firms, DTA has determined that <br />utilizing a Persons Served population comprised of all residents and 50% of the <br />employees working at locations within a given service area is common fiscal practice in <br />generally quantifying the impacts of new development if more specific local data or <br />facilities usage data is not readily available. This ratio suggests that a resident generally <br />has twice the fiscal impact of an employee on the use of a typical public improvement <br />and can be applied to a City's General Fund budget to calculate average revenues and <br />costs per Person Served on a Citywide basis using a Multiplier Approach. While a fiscal <br />impact analysis focused on marginal revenues and costs associated with a specific new <br />development project (with greater emphasis on a Case Study Approach) is often applied <br />to larger projects, the consulting budgets required to evaluate individual metrics related <br />to each type of municipal revenue and service, including interviews with individual <br />municipal departments, can be prohibitive for smaller projects. As a result, while DTA <br />did utilize a Case Study Approach for General Fund revenues and costs that were easy to <br />quantify (e.g., property taxes, sales taxes, and utility user taxes), many of the metrics <br />employed in this Report are based on average revenues/costs per Person Served utilizing <br />the Fiscal Year ("FY") 2023-2024 City budget as could be applied to the Project. <br />DTA also used solely a Per Employee Methodology in this Report to project recurring <br />fiscal factors that relate to employment only, such as business license revenues. Similar <br />to the Persons Served Methodology discussed above, the Per Employee Methodology <br />involves dividing the applicable revenues/costs by the total number of employees in the <br />City utilizing the FY 2023-24 City budget, and applying these factors to the specific <br />number of employees forecast to be working within the Project under the given scenario. <br />For the purposes of the Report, all recurring revenues and costs are stated in constant <br />(uninflated) 2024 dollars based on the assumption that the relative impacts of inflation <br />in future years will be the same for both fiscal impact categories. <br />B Major Assumptions and Analysis Used in This Report <br />B.1 Discounting Revenues and Expenses <br />Certain revenues and expenditures presented in this Report are not expected to <br />increase on a one-to-one basis with the addition of new development. To project <br />these numbers without any adjustment would result in inaccurate conclusions. <br />To accurately account for this factor, DTA applied a series of discount rates to <br />specific budget components. Based on an examination of the numbers presented <br />in the City's annual General Fund budget, 15% and 90% discount rates were <br />applied to several revenue categories as documented in Appendix A-1. As <br />discussed in the previous section of this Report, revenues that are considered non- <br />recurring to the City General Fund, such as revenues generated by <br />building/planning/engineering fees, are excluded from this analysis. Furthermore, <br />DTA applied a 100% discount rate to financing source categories that are deemed <br />EPD Solutions, Inc. May 13 2024 <br />South Coast Technology Center Fiscal Impact Analysis Report <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.