Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. 2024-XXX <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />is not anticipated until the Fall of 2025 and will therefore not adequately address <br />the near-term concerns brought forward by the South Bristol Focus Area <br />residents. <br />G.The City Council finds through extensive environmental review and traffic studies <br />that proposed development projects in the area will not have direct impacts on <br />parking, but none the less, the City Council desires to accommodate present and <br />future requests, related to permit parking in these Parking Districts. <br />H.The City Council finds that the Resolutions referenced above which created the <br />Parking Districts include different standards to be used for defining a block under <br />the Permit Parking District regulations. <br />I.The City Council desires to amend the definition of a block. <br />J.Upon completion of the Citywide parking study, the City Council will consider <br />adopting various recommended parking rules and regulations which may or may <br />not include the amendments considered in this Resolution. <br />K.The proposed resolution amending Resolution No. 91-088, Resolution No. 93- <br />076, and Resolution No. 2000-062 amendment to the Residential Permit <br />Parking program supports and is consistent with multiple General Plan goals <br />and policies of the Mobility Element, Land Use Element, and Housing <br />Element. Addressing relevant permit parking programs and parking impacts is <br />identified in multiple General Plan implementation actions of the Mobility <br />Element, Land Use Element, and Housing Element. Exhibit 19 to the City <br />Council staff report dated September 17, 2024 accompanying this Resolution <br />contains a list of all applicable General Plan goals and policies that support <br />this recommended action. <br />Section 2. The City Council hereby finds that the action is not a “project” subject <br />to CEQA and no environmental review is required. Even if the action could be construed <br />as a CEQA “project”, the proposed resolution requires no further environmental review <br />pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines. <br />Section 15378(b) of the CEQA Guidelines defines a “Project” that is subject to <br />CEQA review as an activity that may result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect <br />physical change in the environment, stating that “Projects do not include” ongoing <br />“administrative or maintenance activities, such as purchases for suppli es, personnel- <br />related actions, general policy and procedure making [Section 15378(b)(2)]” and <br />“organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or <br />indirect physical changes in the environment [Section 15378(b)(5)].” The proposed <br />amendment to Resolution No. 1991-088, Resolution No. 93-076, and Resolution No. <br />2000-062 modifies administration of an existing parking district program by allowing a <br />single permit parking petition to be considered for multiple, contiguous residential blocks <br />Exhibit 17 <br />  <br />  <br />City Council 22 – 1098 9/17/2024