My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 23 - Historic Property Preservation Agreements
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
10/01/2024
>
Item 23 - Historic Property Preservation Agreements
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2024 11:50:53 AM
Creation date
9/25/2024 8:19:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
23
Date
10/1/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />11. Public Comments (items not on the agenda) <br />Madam Chair Kings noted that she had received a lett r from Catherine Cate regarding the <br />proposed Historic French Park Traffic Plan. Mr. Ed rds advised that the Environmental <br />Transportation Advisory Committee (ETAC) was the reviewing body for traffic plans and that <br />any traffic related issues should be forwarded to them. i <br />A letter had also been received from Jeff Dickman, Vice resident Historic French Park Board <br />of Directors, expressing concern that the issue had n t been placed on the June 6, 2002 <br />Historic Resources Commission Agenda. <br />Catherine Cate, French Park resident, expressed concer regarding the impact of the traffic on <br />the neighborhood and requested that the Historic Res urce Commission review the issue <br />since French Park is a Historic District. <br />Barry Jensen, French Park resident, requested that the Historic Resource Commission review <br />the issue as it impacts a historic resource. <br />Madam Chair Kings asked if the traffic count could chang the use to Commercial which would <br />require review by the Commission. Kylee Odette, Dep ty City Attorney, advised that if the <br />issues were aesthetic the Commission could review the . As ETAC is the reviewing body for <br />traffic issues, the Commissioners and the public shouldjattend the meeting and address the <br />issues_ Madam Chair Kings asked if protecting the resigential use would be an issue for the <br />Commission's review and Mr. Edwards responded that i�t was an ETAC issue and should be <br />brought before them. <br />12. Comments from Staff <br />Mr_ Edwards <br />• Noted that the next Template Review Committee meeting would be held on Friday, <br />June 14 at 4:30 p.m. <br />• Advised that draft language for the Historic Plaques had been received and would <br />be distributed to the Commission for comment. <br />13. Comments from Historic Resources Commissio� <br />Commissioner Giles <br />Asked if it would be appropriate for the Commission to prepare a letter to ETAC <br />regarding the proposed French Park Traffic Plan. Ms. Odette responded that it <br />would be better to attend the meeting. <br />• Asked why it was appropriate for the Commission to review the traffic impact that <br />would be created by the proposed One Broadway Plaza project. Mr. Edwards <br />responded that it was appropriate as certain pr posed traffic mitigations involved <br />the potential removal of historic structures. <br />Commissioner Chinn <br />• Noted that Washington Square, Floral Park, and Wilshire Square all have closed <br />off areas to traffic for quality of life issues. <br />Commissioner Richardson <br />• Noted that it appears that there is a differ nce of opinion regarding what <br />destruction of property is and that it could be ither loss of property or loss of <br />quality of life. He recommended that the Commi Sion forward a letter of support to <br />ETAC. Mr. Edwards advised that he would co' suit with Counsel regarding the <br />possibility of placing the item on the agend but that the public should be <br />encouraged to work with ETAC. <br />Commissioner Bustamante <br />• Recommended that the Commission forward a levier of support to ETAC. <br />1 <br />HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES 9 Mav 2. 2002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.