My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 26 - Public Hearing Regarding Bristol Project
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
10/01/2024
>
Item 26 - Public Hearing Regarding Bristol Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2024 12:33:51 PM
Creation date
9/25/2024 8:40:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
26
Date
10/1/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SECTION V <br />ta <br />www.FinanceDTA.com <br />RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS PROPOSED IN <br />THE SPECIFIC PLAN <br />will act as a centerpiece to the parks and Greenlink trails. The public art will include interactive exhibits, <br />such as some exhibits that children may climb on and others that adults may use such as chess tables. It <br />also anticipated that walls would be adorned with art in accordance with local history and lifestyle. <br />F Cap Rates <br />The importance of the market cap rate should be noted. A cap rate is calculated by dividing a property's <br />Net Operating Income ("NOI") by its Net Asset Value ("NAV"). The cap rate is an assessment of the yield <br />of a property over 1 year. Alternatively, if you know a building's NOI, you may divide this by an assumed <br />cap rate to approximate the building's NAV. <br />We have provided a simple definition above. Oftentimes, in the real world, complications arise, such as <br />whether net operating expenses should be modified based on capital reserves or other adjustments. For <br />simplicity in determining NAV of the multifamily units, DTA has reduced net revenue by an estimate of <br />operating expenses and capital reserves to determine NOI. NOI is then divided by the cap rate to establish <br />the NAV. <br />A cap rate is a derived estimate. Often, an investor will study recent sales to determine what investors <br />have paid for similar buildings. The developer or investor will review the expenses for a building and value <br />it according to what others have recently paid for similar buildings. By dividing NOI by the consensus cap <br />rate derived from comparable sales, the investor is able to approximate the value of the building. <br />Cap rates are generally correlated to 10-year Federal government or agency bonds ("Government <br />Bonds"). Currently, Government Bond coupon rates are at about 4%, with the investor assuming there <br />will be absolutely no risk of loss of principal during the term of the Government Bonds. In general, <br />investors are currently allocating investment capital to these riskless investments instead of to IPP. In <br />order for real estate developers to attract capital from investors, they usually accept lower prices <br />(resulting in higher cap rates). The difference between these two investment instruments is referred to <br />as a spread. Sometimes this spread between Class A IPP and the Government Bond rate may be as much <br />as 300 basis points since investors are competing with the government agencies to attract capital to real <br />estate, a riskier investment. Prior to recent the Federal Reserve Bank's actions, 10-year Government <br />Bonds yielded about 2.0%, while the cap rate for Class A multifamily properties in the City was 4%, a <br />spread of 200 basis points. Now that the bond market has priced the 10-year Government Bonds at 4% <br />on a pari passu basis, a developer often has to offer an additional spread to attract investment to IPP. <br />One of the selling points that investors stress to attract capital to the IPP market is to emphasize that <br />although today's cap rate may be 4.0%, potential future increases in rents should yield higher returns than <br />Government Bonds. Increasing rental income provides investors incentives because they usually lead to <br />increased NOI and, with stable cap rates, an increase in NAV. Conversely, bonds offer a fixed annual <br />payment and return on invested capital. Therefore, there is the opportunity for IPP to not only generate <br />increasing annual cash flows, but for the resulting increased NAV to generate a larger return on invested <br />capital. <br />Related Bristol at 3600 South Bristol Street <br />Draft Market Study Report <br />September 2023 <br />Exhibit 10 <br />01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.