My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 26 - Public Hearing Regarding Bristol Project
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
10/01/2024
>
Item 26 - Public Hearing Regarding Bristol Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2024 12:33:51 PM
Creation date
9/25/2024 8:40:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
26
Date
10/1/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Response to Letter L8: Susan Grasse, dated August 11, 2024 <br />This comment letter was received after the public review and comment period ended (July 6, 2023, <br />through August 23, 2023). As stated in Section 15088 of the CEQA Guidelines, Lead Agencies are not <br />required to respond to letters received outside of the noticed comment period. However, the following <br />responses have been prepared to provide clarity regarding the environmental concerns that have been <br />raised. <br />Comment L8.1: This comment states that the commenter has several concerns regarding the proposed <br />Project including security for patrons in the underground parking garage. <br />Response L8.1: The comment does not raise any specific environmental concern with the analysis within the <br />Draft SEIR. CEQA is an environmental protection statute that is concerned with physical changes to the <br />environment (CEQA Guidelines Section 15358(b)). The environment includes land, air, water, minerals, flora, <br />fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance (CEQA Guidelines Section 15360). <br />The Project's potential economic and social effects are not considered effects on the environment (CEQA <br />Guidelines Sections 15064(e) and 151 31(a)). Thus, consistent with CEQA, the Draft SEIR includes an <br />analysis of the Project's potentially significant physical impacts on the environment and does not include <br />substantial discussion of security within parking garages. However, as noted on page 5.1 1-12 of the Draft <br />SEIR, the Project would include development of an administrative Police Department substation within the <br />commercial use area. In addition, the Project would include low -intensity security lighting, security cameras, <br />electronic access to residential buildings, and onsite security personnel. Therefore, adequate security for <br />public patrons would be included within the Project. <br />Comment L8.2: This comment states that the commenter has concerns for student pedestrian safety and <br />commuter traffic safety due to construction equipment along streets. <br />Response L8.2: The comment does not raise any specific environmental concern with the analysis within the <br />Draft SEIR. As required by Mitigation Measure AQ-1, the Project Applicant must prepare a construction <br />traffic control plan detailing the locations of equipment staging areas, material stockpiles, proposed road <br />closures, and hours of construction operations, and designing the plan to minimize impacts to roads <br />frequented by passenger cars, pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non -truck traffic. Therefore, the Project <br />would not result in safety issues related to construction equipment conflicting with pedestrians or commuter <br />vehicles. <br />Comment L8.3: This comment states that the commenter is concerned about solid and airborne debris from <br />trucks. <br />Response L8.3: The comment does not raise any specific environmental concern with the analysis within the <br />Draft SEIR. During construction, the Project would be required to adhere to SCAQMD Rules, such as <br />SCAQMD Rule 403, which requires tarping and/or maintaining a minimum of 24 inches of freeboard on <br />trucks hauling dirt, sand, soils, or other loose materials. Therefore, the Project would not result in solid or <br />airborne debris from construction truck travel. <br />Comment L8.4: This comment states that the commenter is concerned for handicapped accessibility for <br />stores and restaurants during and after construction. <br />Response L8.4: The comment does not raise any specific environmental concern with the analysis within the <br />Draft SEIR. Issues related to parking and handicap accessibility are not a CEQA consideration. However, <br />during construction phasing, the Project would provide adequate ADA parking stalls and handicap <br />accessibility for buildings that remain open. During Project operation, the Project would provide adequate <br />ADA parking stalls and paths of travel pursuant to California Building Code requirements. <br />Comment L8.5: This comment states the commenter is concerned about increased traffic on Sunflower <br />Avenue from the hotel and apartments. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.