My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 26 - Public Hearing Regarding Bristol Project
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
10/01/2024
>
Item 26 - Public Hearing Regarding Bristol Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2024 12:33:51 PM
Creation date
9/25/2024 8:40:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
26
Date
10/1/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comment L23: Jennifer Richardson (1 page) late Comment Letter <br />Ocampo, Nuvia <br />From: Jen R <jenniferrichardson24@gmail.com> <br />Sent: Monday, August 12, 2024 8:28 AM <br />To: eComments, PBA <br />Subject: Agenda Item 1; 08/12/24 meeting <br />Follow Up Flag: Follow up <br />Flag Status: Flagged <br />Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br />To the governing body, <br />I am quite concerned about the plans to potentially move forward regarding redevelopment of 3600 South <br />Bristol Street project site. While I agree that new, affordable housing, relevant shops, and green space are I L23,1 <br />necessary for the growth and wellbeing of a city, I do not support this project, the length of construction phases, <br />and the detrimental environmental impact it will wreak on Santa Ana and Costa Mesa <br />Perhaps most concerning beyond the length and geographical scope of the project is this portion from your <br />flyer: "The EIR concludes that the proposed project would require mitigation related to Air Quality, Cultural <br />Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and <br />Water Quality, Noise, Transportation, and Tribal Cultural Resources. Impacts to Air Quality and Recreation <br />would remain significant and unavoidable after mitigation." <br />Impact to Air Quality would remain significant and unavoidable? Set aside for a moment the loss of retailers <br />providing necessities such as food, water, clothing, and employment, and also set aside the large number of <br />tenants whose homes in rental units will be demolished, you are asking us to get on board with a decadeslong <br />plan whose immediate effects will irrevocably destroy the very air we breathe. Who would agree to this? Not I. <br />This project is a wolf in sheep's clothing. I urge you to reject this project, related zone changes, and not overrule <br />the decision made by John Wayne Airport's Land Use Commission. Five items in total. <br />Please protect our city from this destruction. <br />Thank you for your time. <br />Sincerely, <br />Jennifer Richardson <br />Santa Ana, California <br />L23.2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.