Laserfiche WebLink
dry year scenarios, and that impacts would be less than significant (Draft Supplemental EIR at p. <br />5.1 5-1 1 ). <br />Impact Finding: The Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new <br />wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could <br />cause significant environmental effects (Draft Supplemental EIR at p. 5.15-15). <br />Facts in Support of Findings: The proposed Project would install a new onsite sewer system that <br />would connect directly to the 78-inch OCSD sewer main in Sunflower Avenue. Based on results of <br />the Sewer Analysis Report (included as Appendix Q to the Draft Supplemental EIR), the proposed <br />Project would install a new onsite sewer system that would connect to the existing 78-inch OCSD <br />sewer main within the Sunflower Avenue right-of-way. The Sewer Analysis Report determined that <br />the Sunflower Avenue OCSD sewer main has a maximum capacity of 96.8 cfs and has adequate <br />capacity to accommodate the additional wastewater flows from the proposed Project. <br />The construction activities related to the new onsite sewer system and connection to the existing 78- <br />inch OCSD sewer main is included as part of the proposed Project and would not result in any <br />physical environmental effects beyond those identified throughout the Draft Supplemental EIR. As <br />the proposed Project includes facilities to serve the Project, it would not result in the need for <br />construction of other new wastewater facilities or expansions, the construction of which could cause <br />significant environmental effects. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. This <br />determination is consistent with that of the GPU FEIR, which determined that increases in wastewater <br />from buildout of the South Bristol Street Focus Area increases would be accommodated by the <br />OCSD trunk sewer mains that are proximate to the area, and that impacts related to sewer <br />infrastructure would be less than significant (Draft Supplemental EIR at p. 5.15-15). <br />Impact Finding: The Project would not result in a determination by the wastewater treatment <br />provider that would serve the Project that it has adequate capacity to serve the Project's projected <br />demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments (Draft Supplemental EIR at p. 5.15-15). <br />Facts in Support of Findings: The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Reclamation Plant No. <br />1 has an additional capacity of 52 mgd, which would accommodate the increase in wastewater <br />flow from full occupancy of the proposed Project that would generate 762,241 gpd (0.76 mgd). <br />As a result, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in inadequate capacity of the <br />wastewater treatment plant to serve the Project's demand in addition to existing service <br />commitments, and impacts would be less than significant. This is consistent with the GPU FEIR, which <br />determined that wastewater generated through development in accordance with the GPU would <br />have a less -than -significant impact on the existing wastewater collection and treatment facilities <br />and systems (Draft Supplemental EIR at pp. 5.15-15 through 5.15-1 b). <br />Impact Finding: The Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new storm <br />water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause <br />significant environmental effects (Draft Supplemental EIR at p. 5.15-20). <br />Facts in Support of Findings: The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) (included <br />as Appendix M to the Draft Supplemental EIR) for the proposed Project describes that the Project <br />site currently includes 37.02 acres of impermeable surfaces, which equates to 90 percent of the <br />