Laserfiche WebLink
volume of traffic generated by the proposed Project on MacArthur Boulevard, between SR-55 SB <br />Ramps and SR-55 NB Ramps, would exceed 1.5 dBA for an ambient noise environment of 65 dBA <br />and higher when comparing Year 2045 With proposed Project conditions to existing conditions. <br />However, the proposed Project's incremental contribution would be 0.1 dBA (i.e., far below a 3.0 <br />barely perceptible increase and below the City's 1.5 dBA increase). Therefore, although related <br />cumulative projects and growth would increase traffic noise levels along this segment, the proposed <br />Project's incremental effects would be less than cumulatively significant. <br />The GPU FEIR identified significant and unavoidable impacts for traffic noise; but did not analyze <br />this segment of MacArthur Boulevard. However, GPU FEIR Figure 5.12-5 and Figure 5.12-10 show <br />that this segment of MacArthur Boulevard (between SR-55 SB Ramps and SR-55 NB Ramps) is also <br />within the 70+ dBA contour of SR-55). Therefore, the year 2045 noise level of 69.3 dBA would be <br />lower than the SR-55 traffic noise in this area. Overall, cumulative operational noise impacts from <br />related projects, in conjunction with noise from the proposed Project would not be cumulatively <br />considerable and cumulative traffic noise impacts would be less than significant. (Draft <br />Supplemental EIR at pp. 5.9-32 through 5.9-36.) <br />N. Population and Housing <br />The geographic area in which cumulative impacts to population and housing would occur is the City <br />of Santa Ana, and summary of projections utilized in this analysis of cumulative population and <br />housing impacts is from the summary of the GPU Land Use Element and GPU Final EIR, which <br />evaluates conditions contributing to the cumulative population and housing growth effects. <br />Implementation of the proposed Project would result in 3,750 additional multi -family residential <br />units and 200 senior living/'continuum of care units, as well as 350,000 SF of retail uses and a 250- <br />room hotel. The proposed residential units are within the GPU planned increase in residential units <br />within the South Bristol Street Focus Area. The estimated 9,238 residents at buildout and complete <br />occupancy (a conservative estimate as vacancy in the City is 3.5 percent) would be 48 percent of <br />the GPU FEIR estimated buildout for the South Bristol Street Focus Area, and the 1,092 jobs would <br />consist of 148 percent of the anticipated growth in jobs within the South Bristol Street Focus Area. <br />Hence, the increase in population and housing that would occur from the proposed Project would <br />not exceed those anticipated from buildout of the GPU, as identified in with the GPU Final EIR. <br />Development of the proposed Project in combination with other development projects in the vicinity <br />would result in a cumulative increase in population. However, the proposed Project's portion of the <br />cumulative increase is within those anticipated by the GPU Final EIR. Thus, the proposed Project <br />would not generate any new or increased cumulative impacts related to population and housing. <br />The addition of housing within the Project area would have a favorable effect on the jobs -housing <br />balance, which could reduce environmental effects of long commute trips, such as air quality and <br />greenhouse gas emissions. Also, infrastructure improvements to accommodate the proposed <br />development on the Project site are based on the GPU development assumptions for the site. As a <br />result, no extension of infrastructure would occur that could induce cumulative growth beyond that <br />assumed with buildout of the GPU. Furthermore, infrastructure upgrades and extensions that may <br />be included in related projects would not affect or be related to the proposed Project. Therefore, <br />proposed Project impacts are less than cumulatively considerable, and therefore, less than <br />significant. (Draft Supplemental EIR at pp. 5.10-1 1 through 5.10-12.) <br />