My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
IK CONSULTING, LLC
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
I
>
IK CONSULTING, LLC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2024 1:27:26 PM
Creation date
10/14/2024 11:22:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
IK CONSULTING, LLC
Contract #
A-2024-152
Agency
Information Technology
Council Approval Date
10/1/2024
Expiration Date
12/31/2026
Insurance Exp Date
12/8/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. Per the clarification request, the City is seeking Proposers with specific experience with similar <br /> implementations as well as experience with similar sized California agencies, particularly those <br /> in Orange County. <br /> A. IKC confirms that we have the ability to access a configured environment from a similar <br /> California Accela Civic Platform implementation that has all processes available on line. <br /> B. We have requested and received permission from both Huntington Beach,CA and Chino, <br /> CA to demonstrate their processes. Huntington Beach, CA is within the Orange County <br /> area, while Chino, CA is in the San Bernardino County area. We have several other <br /> jurisdictions that have given us permission in the past to demonstrate their <br /> implementations and we could provide them if requested. Huntington Beach and Chino <br /> have department structures similar to those identified in the Santa Ana RFP, with <br /> comparable record types. Additionally, both cities maintain jurisdiction-specific record <br /> types tailored to their unique needs. <br /> 3. Per the clarification request, the City desires a more agile/iterative approach to analysis, <br /> configuration and testing as opposed to a waterfall methodology. <br /> A. Following an agile approach, IKC proposes the following updated Project Plan. This plan <br /> incorporates seven (7) sprints for the project. The Project Manager will work with staff <br /> during project kickoff to determine the most effective breakdown of processes within the <br /> sprints. These sprint starts are staggered,and will run in parallelto reduce project delays. <br /> B. IKC has created a full project plan utilizing the agile approach, see Appendix A. <br /> C. This approach is acceptable to IKC. <br /> D. Updated project plan items <br /> i. Test Scripts- IKC will develop test script checklists for each process which will <br /> include variations of all specific automations incorporated for each process and <br /> will match the overall configuration documentation. Specific use case scenarios <br /> will be incorporated, with input from staff during the analysis process,to ensure <br /> well rounded testing prior to go-live. <br /> ii. On-Site Presence -The travel budget has been updated to incorporate onsite <br /> resources for allanalysis sessions,configuration reviews,testing reviews for each <br /> sprint and test documentation. See the included Santa Ana - Price <br /> Sheet_IKC_Revised spreadsheet for updated travel budget. <br /> iii. Multi-Phased Approach-IKC will ensure that the project is carefully structured to <br /> align with the two specific phases as requested by the City, allowing for a clear <br /> and organized progression at each phase. <br /> • Phase 1 detailed project plan is attached as Appendix A. <br /> • Phase 2 recommendations can be found on the Santa Ana - Price <br /> Sheet_IKC_Revised spreadsheet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.