Laserfiche WebLink
Short-term Rental <br />Misconceptions <br />STRs are not permitted, therefore illegal in Santa Ana, (FALSE) <br />This concept of "permissive zoning," the doctrine that "zoning ordinances prohibit <br />any use they do not permit" has been rejected by more than one court. Le Keen v. <br />City of Manhattan Beach, 77 Cal. App. 5th 142, 150 (2022), review denied aune 29, <br />2022). Plus, State in People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App. 5th 715, 733 (2021). The <br />court noting that "[a] ppl ication of the permissive zoning scheme in the manner <br />urged by the People would lead to an absurd result where neither short-term <br />nor long-term occupancies would be allowed an apartment House, apartment <br />hotel, or residential building because a length of occupancy is 'not expressed."' <br />2 Short-term rentals increase local rental rates. (FALSE) <br />Many city governments are interested in whether short-term rentals <br />disproportionately affect more vulnerable segments of their population — for <br />example minorities or low-income residents. But *our work has found that the <br />increase in rents in New York City is more concentrated among high -income, <br />educated, white renters and not the population city governments are, in <br />general, concerned with. This is because short-term rentals tend to be <br />concentrated in touristy, centrally located areas where higher -income residents live. <br />*What Does Banning Short -Term Rentals Really Accomplish <br />Here's a look at some U.S. cities that have restricted short-term rentals (STRs) <br />but didn't see the hoped -far drop in long-term rental prices: <br />• New York City: Despite cutting STRs by 80% in 2023, rental prices barely budged. Median rent slightly <br />dropped, but average rents rose year over year, showing minimal impact. <br />• San Francisco: Tight restrictions and mandatory host registration significantly reduced STR listings. However, <br />rental prices remained among the nation's highest, suggesting broader economic factors play a larger role. <br />• Santa Monica, CA: With one of the strictest STR bans, Santa Monica only permits home -sharing with the host <br />present. Long-term rental prices stayed high, indicating that the restrictions didn't improve affordability. <br />• Telluride, CO: The town briefly banned STRs, but after facing economic pushback, it switched to charging <br />STR operators a fee instead. The initial ban didn't lower rents and negatively affected local businesses. <br />3 STRs are responsible for the rising housing costs. (FALSE) <br />There are many factors contributing to local housing affordability challenges, from <br />growing income inequality, to decades of exclusionary zoning, and even changing <br />location preferences post -pandemic, including the rise of remote working from <br />home. Where many experts agree is that the primary driver of the affordability crisis <br />is chronic underproduction of housing. In June 2024, Santa Ana home prices were up <br />11.6% compared to last year. The Santa Ana housing market is expected to see <br />continued growth in the coming years, fueled by several key factors like; <br />Economic Expansion (A strong economy with healthy job growth), Interest Rates <br />(low interest rates stimulate market activity and Demand Maintenance (desirable <br />lifestyle with amenities, proximity to major cultural attractions). <br />Prepare by SASTRA for the City of Santa Ana 8 <br />