My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - PH #35
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
11/19/2024
>
Correspondence - PH #35
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2024 5:14:27 PM
Creation date
11/13/2024 2:37:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
35
Date
11/19/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CAJA Environmental Services, LLC <br />9410 Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite 101 <br />Chatsworth, CA 91311 <br />Phone 310-469-6700 Fax 310-806-9801 <br />Public Services <br />Overview <br />There are a number of potentially significant impacts with respect to public services that could result from <br />an STR ban and require further analysis by the City. Increased utilization of existing hotels as a result of <br />eliminating all STRs in the City is reasonably likely to lead to increased demand for public services, which <br />may be significant. Further, as mentioned above, it is reasonably foreseeable that additional hotels would <br />need to be constructed to accommodate patrons who would have previously utilized STRs. The operation <br />of new hotels has the potential to result in significant environmental impacts with respect to public services. <br />The Addendum fails to address any of these potential impacts, concluding without supporting evidence <br />that the Proposed Ordinance would "only affect existing structures" and therefore, there would be no <br />change in public services impacts beyond those identified in the GP PEIR. (Staff Report, Exhibit 3, p. 44.) <br />This is inadequate. <br />The Analysis in the Addendum Fails to Address Potentially Significant Impacts <br />The Addendum's analysis of impacts to public services from the STR ban is insufficient, finding that the <br />STR ban would only affect existing structures, and that the STR ban would not "introduce new residential <br />units to the city" and that the "residential units illegally operating as STRs were adequately analyzed in the <br />GP PEIR" as part of the GP buildout. (Staff Report, Exhibit 3, p. 44.) The analysis in the Addendum lacks <br />any consideration of the reasonably foreseeable impacts to public services resulting from operation of <br />existing and new hotels. <br />Operation of Existing Hotels <br />As discussed above in the Noise and vibration section, the City failed to evaluate how the potential for <br />noise and nuisance complaints associated with hotels may be greater than those associated with STRs. <br />The City must evaluate the potential for increased demand for public services due to those complaints, <br />which may be significant. <br />Operation of New Hotels <br />With respect to impacts to fire and police facilities, STR restrictions that could result in the construction of <br />new replacement hotels or other facilities would result in increased demand for fire and police protection <br />facilities to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives. The City <br />should provide a calculation of the number of calls to police complaining about hotels compared to the <br />number of calls to police regarding STRs, to analyze whether eliminating all STRs and increasing hotel <br />use would increase demand for police services. Mitigation measures may need to be provided to reduce <br />impacts to less than significant. Absent any feasible mitigation, impacts to public services (specifically fire <br />and police) could be significant. <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.