Laserfiche WebLink
1. A fine not exceeding one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) for a <br />first violation. <br />2. A fine not exceeding three thousand dollars ($3,000) for a second <br />violation of the same ordinance within one (1) year of the first violation. <br />3. A fine not exceeding five thousand dollars ($5,000) for each additional <br />violation of the same ordinance within one (1) year of the first violation. <br />B. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 36900(e), the citation <br />recipient of a fine may request a hardship waiver pursuant to the process <br />established by the Director of the City's Planning and Building Agency. <br />Section 3. State CEQA Guidelines section 15164 requires lead agencies to <br />prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions to the <br />project are necessary, but none of the conditions requiring preparation of a subsequent <br />or supplemental EIR are present. The City Council has reviewed and considered the <br />General Plan Update EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2020029087) ("GPU EIR"), the <br />Addendum to the GPU EIR, and finds that these documents taken together contain a <br />complete and accurate reporting of all the potential environmental impacts associated <br />with this Resolution. The City Council finds that the Addendum has been completed in <br />compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The City Council further finds <br />and determines that the Addendum reflects the City's independent judgment. <br />Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not limited <br />to the GPU EIR and the Addendum, the City Council finds that an addendum is the <br />appropriate document for disclosing the changes to the GPU, and that none of the <br />conditions identified in Public Resources Code section 21166 and State CEQA <br />Guidelines section 15162 requiring subsequent environmental review have occurred, <br />because the Resolution does not change or alter in any way the existing land use <br />designations City-wide set forth in the General Plan Update and analyzed in the GP <br />EIR. No development, redevelopment, or change to existing development type in the <br />City is proposed or required to implement the Resolution. The buildout of housing had <br />previously been analyzed within the scope of the GPU EIR, and the Resolution would <br />not result in additional development of housing within the City. Based on these findings, <br />the City Council makes the following findings: <br />a) The Resolution does not constitute a substantial change that would <br />require major revisions of the GPU EIR due to the involvement of new <br />significant environmental effects. <br />b) There is not a substantial change with respect to the circumstances <br />under which the Resolution will be implemented that would require major <br />revisions of the GPU due to the involvement of new significant environmental <br />effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified <br />significant effects. <br />Resolution No. 2024-072 <br />Page 2 of 67 <br />