My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-17-1972
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1972
>
01-17-1972
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 2:00:18 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 10:36:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/17/1972
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS <br />CHINO HILLS AIRPORT - (Continued) <br /> <br />Councilman Evans stated he was nbt prepared to support such a resolution without <br />some sort of advice or study from others not involved in the report; that he <br />believes the need is there, but there are a lot of aspects that the Council is not <br />familiar with. Councilman Herrin concurred. <br /> <br />Councilman Herrin's motion to refer the matter to staff for further information <br />and report to Council was seconded by Councilman Evans and unanimously carried. <br /> <br />RECESS At 4:05 P.M., the meeting was <br /> recessed to 7:30 P.M., at which <br /> time it was reconvened with the <br />following Council members present: Vernon S. Evans, Wade Herrin, J. Ogden <br />Markel, Ray Villa, Harry K. Yamamoto, and Mayor Lorin Griset. Councilman <br />P~tterson arrived at 10:00 P. M. <br /> <br />APPEAL #286 The Mayor opened the public <br />VA 71-52 hearing on Appeal #286 filed by <br />G.L.A. DEVELOPMENT COMPANY G.L.A. Development Company <br /> appealing Condition 6-A of Variance <br />Application 71-52, approved by the Planning Commission, to construct an 84-unit <br />apartment development in the R 1 District at 5140 W. McFadden Avenue. <br /> <br />The Director of Planning stated that the General Plan indicates low density for <br />this area; that there are some apartment developments, but the area is mainly <br />single-family residences; that in addition to density of 25 units per acre, the <br />coverage is 57% which is considerably in excess of what the Code allows; that the <br />Planning Commission recognized some of the difficulties, and even though they <br />were willing to exceed the General Plan density, they did adopt the staff recommenda- <br />tion that if the Variance were granted, it be restricted to the density of 15 units per <br />acre, <br /> <br />The Clerk reported no written communications had been received. <br /> <br />Mr. George Argyros, 17291Irvine, Tustin, stated that they are very close to <br />solving this property's problelns which they have dealt with for seven years; that <br />they are appealing only a portion of the condition 6-A; that they can meet the <br />condition of 50% open space. Slides were presented on the Viewgraph showing the <br />property as it is today; and color prospective, site plan, and elevation study of <br />the proposed project were presented. He stated the total value would approximate <br />$1, 000,000. In response to a question from the Mayor, Mr. Argyros stated that the <br />new plan would eliminate all 3-bedroom units, bringing the total units to <br />approximately 74. <br /> <br />There were no further proponents or opponents in the matter, and the Mayor closed <br />the public hearing. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL -28- January 17, 1972 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.