Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br />.--..-. ''',',,',' '.. <br /> <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Fax:714-647-6515 <br />,. ,. , . -......-... -' .' --:, .,' "~,.'" .."',". ,,;'" ' . <br /> <br />Jan 18 '05 15:19 P.04 <br />'t :~"'-:":'.;'.; .:~~~i:'~Ft;~':;'r..~rtt~';:,?c:~'~~~:(~:':7t,,~:t,!~,:~:,..~~~p:::;¡1'"~-:' ",..';"1'"" '""',"~,'"" ,- . <br /> <br />..'. ," ...... .. <br />. . . <br /> <br />Additionally, a large number do not protest the a&lessmcnt at all, but rather petition the City <br />Council to dissolve or disestablish the BID. This process cannot be compelled by petition ,or <br />protest. <br /> <br />In the interest of full dÌsclœure, howevE!r~ Treasury staff proceeded to evaluate aU of the <br />petitions to detemúnc; 8$$UUlÏng they were to be qualified as protests, whethor they were <br />sufficient to constitute a majority protest. <br /> <br />Treasury staff found that they do not constitute a lllajority protest in any event. <br /> <br />Protest Anal~ <br />Applicable State law provides that protœts to 8SIiCSSIl1enbi are calculated as a pezœntage oftbe <br />total assessment md therefore are weighted. Protests fiom businesses paying bighor assessments <br />are worth more than those paying lower assessments. <br /> <br />Category (I) petitions constitute only 12.85% of the total assessment. These are the only <br />documents that could conceivably be treated II protð$t$ 6Ínce they challenge assessments unðer <br />tho BID. <br /> <br />Category (2) petitions constitute 11.62% of the total assessment. A$ petitions to dissolve the <br />BID, they are least likely to be qualified as protests. <br /> <br />Nevertheless7 even if Categorî~ (1) and (2) are combined for a total of24.47%, Ms. Gomez's <br />petitions still constitu.te less than 25% protest. Far less than the 50% necessary. <br /> <br />Category (3) petiti~ which constitute 2.38%7 don't in any way apply to the BID, but rather <br />DSABA which is no longer relevant. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br /> <br />R endation --- <br />vise the City Council to make a ñnclÚlg as part of the public hearin¡ on January 18, 2005. <br />consistent 'Nith this memo, that the December 20, 2004 petitions are not valid .- <br /> <br />Te-tile" copies of these documents should be rejected. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />:. . <br /> <br />. . <br />