Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Jack W. Golden <br />September 16, 2004 <br />Page 12 of20 <br /> <br />Pa~e 5. Item 3. Third Sentence <br /> <br />"He also suggests that buildings be required to be designed to be sufficiently <br />indoor oriented so as to preclude noise impingement on exterior living <br />areas." <br /> <br />We questioned ALUC staff as to the meaning of this comment. The ALUC staff has <br />previously admitted that it is confusing and they have been unable to explain the rationale <br />for including it. <br /> <br />I do not understand how making residential units, which by their nature are indoor oriented, <br />"sufficiently indoor oriented" willstop noise impingements on the exterior of the building. <br />The indoor sound attenuation measures are already discussed in the AEE and cannot <br />diminish the actual noise on the exterior of the building. <br /> <br />VIII. Pa!?:e 5. Item 4 <br /> <br />A. Paragraph 1 <br /> <br />"On page 11 of the Airport Environs Element. the City quotes language <br />from the AEL UP inserting its name in the place of the AL UC as to <br />recognizing the FAA as the single authority. However, this language is <br />taken out of context in that it does not utilize the additional language from <br />the AEL UP (presently on pages 13 and 18). which has been a part of the <br />Plan since at least as far back as 1983. invoking the right to utilize criteria <br />for protecting air traffic patterns which may differ from Federal Aviation <br />Regulation ("FAR ") Part 77, should evidence of health, welfare or air <br />safety surface sufficiently to justify such an action. The General Plan must <br />be revised to achieve consistency with the JWA AELUP. This criteria will <br />essentially provide the City Council with the flexibility to invoke such a <br />public health. welfare and safety standard if the mere numbers so not tell <br />the full story. " <br /> <br />You are correct that the language in the City's AEE "quotes language from the AELUP." <br />Your concerns about ALUC's power have been addressed by the inclusion, at the ALUC <br />staffs request, of the State law section in the AEE. The AEE on page 17 states 'The City <br />of Santa Ana will comply with and administer all requirements established by state law and <br />the Public Utilities Code." The ALUC is granted under Section 21674 the power and duty <br />"[t]o coordinate planning at the state, regional and local levels so as to provide for the <br />orderly development of air transportation, while at the same time protecting the public <br />health, safety and welfare." It is unnecessary in a city's general plan to list each of the <br />powers and duties provided to the ALUC under state law. We believe that adding this <br />superfluous reference in the General Plan is unnecessary. <br /> <br />75C-207 <br />