Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Shea Homes Residential Project Findings and Facts in Support of Findings <br />Environmental Impact Report <br /> <br />4.3.12 Population and Housing <br /> <br />The proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan. The increased population and <br />housing stock generated by the proposed project would not significantly exceed the local and <br />regional housing and population projections for the City of Santa Ana. There are no existing <br />residential uses located on the property. Implementation of the proposed project would not <br />displace any existing onsite residential uses or any offsite residential uses surrounding the project <br />site. <br /> <br />4.3.13 Public Services <br /> <br />The proposed project would not substantially increase the demand for fire protection and emergency <br />medical services. The Santa Ana Fire Department has indicated that it does not anticipate any <br />significant constraints in providing fire protection and emergency medical services to the proposed <br />project. <br /> <br />Implementation of the proposed project would not significantly increase the demand for police <br />protection services or increase the existing response times within the project area. The Santa Ana <br />Police Department has indicated that under existing levels of manpower and equipment, they would <br />have the ability to provide adequate police protection services. <br /> <br />The payment of impact fees to the SAUSD would reduce project-related impacts to school <br />services within the SAUSD to a level considered less than significant. <br /> <br />The proposed project would not significantly increase the demand for park uses. To help maintain <br />and/or expand recreation facilities within the City, the proposed project would be subject to the <br />City's park acquisition and development impact fee. With the payment of park fees, potential <br />impacts to park and recreation facilities would be less than significant. <br /> <br />4.3.14 Recreation <br /> <br />Implementation of the proposed project would not significantly increase the demand for <br />recreational facilities. With the payment of park acquisition and development impact fees, <br />potential park and recreation impacts would be less than significant. <br /> <br />4.3.15 Transportation <br /> <br />The traffic volumes generated by the project would not exceed the projections in the City's <br />Circulation Element and would not reduce the level of service of any project area intersection or <br />roadway segment to an unacceptable level. <br /> <br />Implementation of the proposed project would not result in any changes to air traffic patterns. Nor <br />would the proposed project result in any substantial safety risks related to aircraft traffic. <br /> <br />Both the Fire Department and Police Department have indicated that the proposed project would not <br />pose any emergency access constraints. <br /> <br />Resolution No. 2005-107 <br />Page 30 of 38 <br /> <br />Page 19 <br />