My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2006-12-18
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2006
>
12/18/2006
>
FULL PACKET_2006-12-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:42:41 PM
Creation date
12/13/2006 12:29:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood <br />and regional parks or other recreational facilities such <br />that substantial physical deterioration of the facility <br />would occur or be accelerated? <br />Less than significant impact. <br />The proposed project will not result in a substantial or <br />significant increase in residents and employees in the area. <br />However, the project does propose an onsite courtyard at the <br />street level, and may be used for passive recreation. Since <br />this project is infill development, and is of a relatively small <br />scale, the project does not affect long term City goals for <br />recreational land uses. Impacts will be less than significant. <br />B. Does the project include recreational facilities or require <br />the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, <br />which might have an adverse physical effect on the <br />environment. <br />No Impact <br />A roof deck is proposed that will allow for additional <br />recreational space for residents. No adverse impacts would <br />occur as a result of these new recreation facilities. <br />XIV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC <br />A. Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in <br />relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the <br />street system? <br />B. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of <br />service standard established by the county congestion <br />management agency for designated roads or highways? <br />Less than significant impacts <br />It is projected that implementation of this proposed project <br />would result in an increase of 80 daily trips with a four A.M. <br />peak hour trips and seven P.M. peak hour trips. This is not <br />considered a substantial increase to existing traffic load and <br />capacity of the street system. <br />The Circulation Element of the City of Santa Ana states that <br />minimum acceptable Level of Service to be a "D" for major <br />7~~5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.