Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FY 2006 HOMELAND SEC'URITY GRANT PROGRAM - DECEMBER 2, 2005 <br /> <br />Infrastructure protection involves a multi-faceted understanding ofthe risks and vulnerabilities <br />facing infrastructure sectors that cross geospatial boundaries. It also requires an understanding <br />of the inter-relationships of infrastructure sectors within geospatial areas. Consequently, <br />protecting critical infrastructure and key resources sites is a shared responsibility requiring <br />cooperation among all levels of government - Federal, State, local, and Tribal- and the <br />involvement of the private sector. Effective security involves plans that define, identitY, and set <br />priorities for the most critical structures and assets that are potential targets for terrorist attacks. <br />With the inclusion of interim NIPP implementation as a National Priority, infrastructure <br />protection efforts are a required component of both State and Urban Area Strategies and thus <br />forrn a key pillar of the overarching homeland security program. <br /> <br />States and Urban Areas are responsible for developing and implementing a critical infrastructure <br />protection program as a component of their overarching homeland security program. This <br />program should engage all relevant intergovernmental coordination points (e.g., Federal, State, <br />local, and Tribal) to ensure a comprehensive approach to critical infrastructure protection across <br />all appropriate levels of government, across both public and private sectors, within geospatial <br />areas, and across infrastructure sectors. <br /> <br />Benchmarks for implementation of this National Priority include: <br /> <br />· During FY 2006 States and Urban Areas should establish a critical infrastructure <br />protection program as a component of their overarching homeland security program. <br />· The critical infrastructure program should engage all relevant intergovernmental <br />coordination points (e.g., Federal, State, local, and Tribal) to ensure a comprehensive <br />approach to critical infrastructure protection across all appropriate levels of government, <br />across both public and private sectors, within geospatial areas, and across infrastructure <br />sectors. <br /> <br />Later this year, the DHS Preparedness Directorate will release guidance for several additional <br />grant programs supporting the protection of critical infrastructure assets. <br /> <br />In addition to the overarching priorities, there are four capability-specific priorities: <br /> <br />CA. Stren!!then Information Sharin!! and Collaboration Capabilities <br /> <br />Effective terrorism prevention, protection, response, and recovery efforts depend on timely, <br />accurate inforrnation about the identity of the enemy, where they operate, how they are <br />supported, and potential methods of attack. Over the next two years, the Federal government <br />will develop an Inforrnation Sharing Environment that will enhance existing Federal capabilities <br />and improve linkages with State and local governments. <br /> <br />Benchmarks for implementation of this National Priority include: <br /> <br />. Access to the DHS Homeland Security Inforrnation Network to strengthen the real-time <br />collaborative flow of threat inforrnation among homeland security partners. <br /> <br />PREPAREDNESS DIRECTORATE'S OFFICE OF GRANTS AND TRAINING <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />