Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FY 2006 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM -- DECEMBER 2, 2005 <br /> <br />The risk formula for the FY 2006 HSGP consists of making two different, but complementary, <br />risk calculations: asset-based risk and geographically-based risk. <br /> <br />. Asset-based risk utilizes threat values derived from Intelligence Community assessments <br />of the intent and capability of adversaries to accomplish a set of baseline attack modes. <br />These threats and attack types are mapped against specific infrastructure types (e.g., <br />bridges, dams, and chemical plants). <br />· Geographically-based risk takes into account values that are based on the inherent <br />attributes of the geographical candidate (i.e., State or Urban Area). This analysis takes <br />into account such factors as international borders, terrorism-related reporting and <br />investigations, and population density. <br /> <br />The risk associated with assets is combined with the risk associated with a geographical area to <br />produce a total terrorism risk score. <br /> <br />Need <br />The needs of State and local governments will be determined as an output of the Program and <br />Capability Review initiative currently underway. This effort seeks to assist States in determining <br />tbeir needs in relation to the capabilities outlined in the Goal through a comprehensive evaluation <br />of their homeland security program and priority capabilities. Through this review process, States <br />will develop two key submissions for the FY 2006 HSGP application: <br /> <br />. Prozram and Caoabilitv Enhancement Plan, which is a multi-year global program <br />management plan for the entire State homeland security program that looks beyond G&T <br />grant programs and funding; and <br />. Investment Justification, which identifies areas of specific Initiatives from the <br />Enhancement Plan for which States wish to utilize FY 2006 HSGP funding. <br /> <br />States must use the Investment Justification to outline implementation approaches for specific <br />investments that will go towards achieving the Initiatives outlined in their Enhancement Plan, <br />and justify all funding requested through the HSGP, including all VASI funding, any base <br />allocations for SHSP and LETPP, and all formula allocations under MMRS and CCP. <br />Applications will be evaluated based on the effectiveness ofa State's plan to address priorities it <br />has outlined, and thereby reduce its overall risk. This approach creates incentives for States and <br />Urban Areas to develop innovative solutions and effectively leverage HSGP funds in the <br />management and implementation of their overall homeland security program. Scoring criteria <br />are outlined in the Application Kit section of this document. <br /> <br />Additional information on the Program and Capability Enhancement Plan and Investment <br />Justification, including scoring criteria, are available in Chapter IV Application Kit. Detailed <br />guidance, including an Investment Justification template is available in Appendix B. <br /> <br />All Investment Justifications will be formally reviewed and scored through a peer review <br />process. States will be notified of their final total allocation at the time of award. <br /> <br />PREPAREDNESS D1RECTORATE'S OFFICE OF GRANTS AND TRAINING <br /> <br />53 <br /> <br />