Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FY 2006 HOMELAND SECURrTY GRANT PROGRAM - DECEMBER 2, 2005 <br /> <br />and emergency services to such an extent that national security could be threatened. <br />Catastrophic events result in unique challenges regarding such issues as mass care, search and <br />rescue, victim and fatality management and transportation, public health and medical support, <br />and public information, many of which are also critical issues for terrorism preparedness. <br /> <br />Grantees may use UASI funding to achieve or enhance all of the 37 capabilities, as long as they <br />enhance the capability to prevent, protect against, respond to, or recover from acts of terrorism. <br />Grantees should consult the Catastrophic Incident Supplement to the NRP and the planning <br />assumptions upon which it is centered to understand the scope of catastrophic incidents relative <br />to their own prioritization of capabilities and resource allocations. Grantees should focus their <br />proposed FY 2006 Investments on the National Priorities and their most urgent State/local <br />priorities. <br /> <br />The FY 2006 UASI program further provides the opportunity to enhance regional preparedness <br />efforts. Urban Areas must employ regional approaches to overall preparedness and are <br />encouraged to adopt regional response structures whenever appropriate to meet the goals <br />identified in the Urban Area Homeland Security Strategy. Furthermore, it is G&T's intent to <br />guide State and Urban Area security and preparedness efforts toward a process to address <br />common, measurable objectives. Security and preparedness officials at all levels should seek <br />opportunities to leverage funding from multiple sources whenever possible and not restrict their <br />activities to Federal funding alone. This funding will be provided to identified Urban Area <br />authorities through the SAAs. In some instances Urban Area boundaries cross State borders. <br />States must ensure that the identified Urban Areas take an inclusive regional approach to the <br />development and implementation of the FY 2006 UASI program and involve the contiguous <br />jurisdictions, mutual aid partners, port authorities, rail and transit authorities, State agencies, <br />Citizen Corps Council(s), and MMRS(s) in their program activities. <br /> <br />G&T encourages all current and former geographically contiguous Urban Areas to continue <br />existing coordinated and collaborative planning structures and efforts in developing, integrating, <br />and implementing homeland security activities. This includes, but is not limited to, participation <br />on advisory committees and working groups involved in homeland security planning and <br />preparedness processes and activities. <br /> <br />B. Program Requirements <br /> <br />The State agency with overall responsibility for developing the State Homeland Security <br />Strategy and administering G&T programs will be responsible for the administration of the FY <br />2006 UASI program. <br /> <br />Data Count for FY 2006 UAS] Eligibility Determination: To identify jurisdictions for <br />inclusion in the data count phase, all cities with a population greater than 100,000 and any city <br />with reported threat data during the past year were identified. Cities on this list with shared city <br />boundaries were combined into a single entity for data count purposes. A 10-mile buffer was <br />then drawn from the border of that city or combined entity to establish the geographical area in <br />which data was evaluated. <br /> <br />PREPAREDNESS DIRECTORATE'S OFFICE OF GRANTS AND TRAfNING <br /> <br />77 <br /> <br /> <br />