FULL PACKET_2007-04-16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JIZECEIVE® Mike Tazdif 1419 E. 19's St. Santa Ana, CA 92705 Feb. 23, 2007 City of Santa Ana Planning Commission 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92702 Re: HD Supply (Home Depot) Variance application no. 07-O1 Subject property: 1044 E. 4°i St. Tazdif Sheet Metal: 412 N. Santa Fe St. To the members of the Planning Commission: MAR 2 6 2007 '~~4~'n iiNA PLANNING DEPP I am a business and property owner who would be directly effected if the City were to allow this "contractors supply warehouse" to go in at 1044 E. 4s' St. I am also a resident of Santa Ana. Concerning the application of HD Supply (HDS) for a variance from City of Santa Ana parking requirements. HDS will occupy 88,000 square feet. HDS represents that they are applying for a variance as an Industrial business. They are asking for a reduction in the 2 pazking space per 1,000 sq. ft. of building space required for an Industrial business. This is a misrepresentation of the true nature of the business they intend to conduct at this location. HD Supply is a retail business. Contained in the HDS bou hght and paid for parking analysis are direct references to the fact that this type of store caters to "home improvement customers" and "residential customers." It is not substantially different from a regular retail Home Depot home improvement store. This is a retail business it is not Industrial application. As a retail business, HDS home improvement store is required to adhere to the retail requirement of 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of building space. They aze providing only a questionable 104 parking spaces when they should be providing the retail requirement of 440 spaces. They aze 75% short of the required number of parking spaces for their retail business. HDS and the City, if this variance application is approved, are mandating that the surrounding business and residential community absorb their grossly under allowed pazking situation. This area is already severely impacted by a shortage of pazking. To ask us to absorb this additional parking burden would be devastating to the community. HD Supply has had months and months of time and tons of high paid professional assistance to prepaze their slick and misleading variance application. The property owners, business owners and residents of the area which will be directly effected by their inadequate pazking allowance have had less than a week to prepare a response. I am asking the members of the Planning Commission to deny this variance application. Respectfully submitted, Mike / ~G~~ Page 3 of 43 31 A-70