Laserfiche WebLink
`Bill Mock <br />From: Mathieu, Ron [MATHIEUR@scrra.net] <br />Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 3:43 PM <br />To: Dinah Minteer; Bill Mock <br />Cc: Darrell Johnson; Wylie, Steve; Quirk, David <br /> <br />Mason Avenue <br />aueuing.doc (SSO ... <br />Dinah, I don't feel comfortable in allowing this new tenant of the <br />building use any of the R/W adjacent to the crossing for turning trucks. <br />As a matter of fact, we don't want any trucks entering or leaving a <br />driveway that close to an existing crossing. It would present queuing, <br />line of sight and other related safety issues. We are operating on a <br />curved track there and also entering a station. The intent of the OCTA <br />Grade Crossing Study as well as SCRRA's new Sealed Corridor Study that <br />is being conducted in LA County, is to make the crossings safer and that <br />includes looking at adjacent land uses such as truck traffic impacts to <br />crossing safety. The loading docks that I see may have been doors that <br />were installed for past rail service for the previous business. We <br />don't want to see a new tenant encourage large truck moves in and around <br />this building or to build a new loading dock in that area. It is my <br />understanding that this will be a distribution center and will have many <br />trucks coming in and out. They should use the other side of their <br />building. <br />The queuing in the attached photo in the word document is taken at a new <br />at-grade crossing isn LA County caused by a truck backing into a <br />business. Another reason to get rid of driveways adjacent to the <br />crossing is that these same Cities that are allowing them are also <br />asking for Quiet Zones. This is addressed in the new FRA Train Horn <br />Rule as well (no driveways within 60 ft. of track). <br />Sincerely, <br />Ron Mathieu <br />Manager Public Projects <br />SCRRA/Metrolink <br />(213) 952-0249 <br />(213) 452-0923 fax <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Dinah Minteer [mailto:DMinteer@octa.net] <br />Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 11:33 AM <br />To: Mathieu, Ron; Bill Mock <br />Cc: Darrell Johnson - <br />Subject: FW: MC02PRNT656 has been scanned <br />FYI. What now, Ron? <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Ross, Jim (mailto:JRoss@ci.santa-ana.ca.us] <br />Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 3:03 PM <br />To: Ross, Jim; Dinah Minteer <br />Cc: Paul Taylor <br />Subject: RE: MC02PRNT 656 has been scanned <br />OK, my mistake, I just re read it and they are saying 9.6' clear total <br />1 Page 24 of 43 <br />~ 31 A-91 <br />