Laserfiche WebLink
MM4.11-12 Standard Street at First Street —Construct third eastbound and westbound shared <br />through -right lanes for 2035 conditions. The improvement is only needed for 2035 conditions. <br />(Impact 4.11-8) <br />MM4.11-13 Grand Avenue at Santa Ana Boulevard —Construct a third southbound through lane <br />and eastbound right -turn overlap signal phasing. (Impact 4.11-8) <br />MM4.11-14 Grand Avenue at First Street —Construct a third eastbound shared through/right- <br />turn lane, a third westbound shared through/right-turn lane, and a third northbound through lane <br />with dedicated northbound right -turn lane for 2035 conditions. The improvement is only needed <br />for 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) <br />MM4.11-15 Grand Avenue at 1-5 Northbound Ramps —Construct a second westbound right -turn <br />lane and for the 1-5 northbound off ramp under both 2030 and 2035 conditions. (Impact 4.11-8) <br />MM4.11-16 1-5 at Santa Ana Blvd. —Northbound Off -Ramp —The City of Santa Ana Department <br />of Public Works shall coordinate with Caltrans for the installation of a second ramp lane for the <br />1-5 northbound off ramp. The improvement shall be implemented to mitigate 2035 conditions. <br />(Impact 4.11-9) <br />Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />The City determined that impacts related to exceeding standards from the Orange County <br />Transportation Authority (Impact 4.111-2), change in air traffic patterns (Impact 4.11-3), <br />hazards due to a design future or incompatible uses (Impact 4.11-4), inadequate emergency <br />access (Impact 4.11-5), inadequate parking capacity (Impact 4.11-6), and alternative <br />transportation (Impact 4.11-7) were below the level of significance and did not require <br />mitigation. Impacts related to neighborhood traffic (Impact 4.11-1) and traffic increases to the <br />existing traffic load (Impact 4.11-8) were less than significant with the implementation of <br />mitigation measures. Impacts related to development near freeway ramps (Impacts 4.11-9) <br />were found to be significant and unavoidable and that specific economic, social, or other <br />considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible <br />mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. <br />Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be <br />subject to a project -level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual <br />project. Mitigation measures MM4.11-1 through MM4.11-16 would continue to apply. <br />The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 — Current and Proposed Text <br />Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because <br />specific development projects are neither included nor required. The new regulations would <br />provide recharging spaces for electric vehicles. Also, all truck parking areas must be on paved <br />surfaces and the parking, loading or unloading of trucks associated with a business on public <br />streets is prohibited. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed <br />amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. This will result in a <br />beneficial impact to transportation. Therefore, the existing less than significant and significant <br />and unavoidable transportation impacts would not result in new or different impacts. <br />5.12 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS <br />This section analyzes the effects to utilities and service systems from implementing the <br />proposed zoning code regulations. <br />Would the project: <br />January 2025 48 Environmental Analysis <br />