Laserfiche WebLink
significant reporting errors. At a minimum, Federal agency, recipients, and sub - recipients <br />should establish internal controls to ensure data quality, completeness, accuracy and <br />timely reporting of all amounts funded by the Recovery Act. Possible approaches to this <br />include; <br />• Establishing control totals (e.g., total number of projects subject to reporting, total <br />dollars allocated to projects) and verify that reported information matches the <br />established control totals; <br />• Creating an estimated distribution of expected data along a "normal" distribution <br />curve and identify outliers; <br />• Establishing a data review protocol or automated process that identifies <br />incongruous results (e.g., total amount spent on a project or activity is equal to or <br />greater than the previous reporting); and <br />• Establishing procedures and/cross- validation of data to identify and/or eliminate <br />potential "double counting" due to delegation of reporting responsibility to sub - <br />recipient (see Section 2.9). <br />4.4 What is the process and timing of data quality review efforts? <br />Recipients and sub - recipients reporting Section 1512 data into the <br />www.FederalReporting.gov solution must initiate a review of the data both prior <br />to, and following, the formal submission of data. The post- submission review <br />period runs from the 11 h day of the reporting month to the 21 S` day of the <br />reporting month for prime recipients. During this post - submission review period, <br />significant reporting errors or material omissions that are discovered can be <br />corrected using the www.FederalReporting.gov solution. Specific instructions for <br />submitting new or corrected data will be provided on the <br />www.FederalReporting_gov website. The prime recipients are responsible for <br />reviewing data submitted by sub - recipients. Where a recipient identifies a data <br />quality issue with respect to information submitted by the sub - recipient, the <br />recipient is required to alert the relevant sub - recipient of the nature of the problem <br />identified by the recipient. All corrections by recipients and sub - recipients <br />during this phase of the review must be transmitted by the 21s` day of the <br />reporting month. <br />Federal agencies will initiate a review of the data after formal submission by the <br />recipients and sub - recipients. During the recipient and sub - recipient review <br />period (i.e., day 11 to day 21 of the reporting month), Federal agencies will have <br />access to review the data and should begin initial reviews at this time. However, <br />the official agency review process begins on the 22nd day of the reporting month <br />and runs until the 29h day of the reporting month. During this period, the Federal <br />agency will be responsible for reviewing data submitted by recipients and sub - <br />recipients. Where an agency identifies a data quality issue with respect to <br />information submitted by the recipient or sub - recipient, the Federal agency is <br />required to alert the relevant recipient of the nature of the problem identified by <br />29 <br />