Laserfiche WebLink
percent of money disbursed with the percent complete or comparing the project/activity <br />code with the project's narrative description. The agency may choose to review fields for <br />reasonableness, such as the estimated number of jobs created/retained; or choose to <br />measure the value of infrastructure costs with the rationale for the infrastructure <br />investment. <br />• Completion Status <br />• Estimate of number of jobs created <br />• Estimate of number of jobs retained <br />• Purpose of infrastructure investment <br />• Rationale for funding the infrastructure investment with ARRA funds <br />• NEPA Compliance Status <br />• NEPA Supporting Information <br />3.14 Can agencies use recipient reporting to make decisions impacting the <br />recipient's awards? <br />Although the intent of the recipient reporting solution is primarily reporting as opposed to <br />management, Federal agencies may use recipient reports to help assess compliance with <br />the terms and conditions of the individual award agreements, further assess risks and to <br />determine when to release the remaining funds. For example, for certain grant programs <br />a Federal agency may have partially awarded each State's allocation with the intent to <br />award the remaining available Recovery funds after each State addresses how the they <br />will meet the reporting requirements in the Recovery Act, including the recipient reports <br />required by Section 1512(c). In this case, the agency may publish specific guidance that <br />only affects its grants, in accordance with these reporting requirements, to specify what <br />information recipients must provide before receiving the balance of its Recovery grants. <br />26 <br />