Laserfiche WebLink
and reporting processes. Questions regarding specific Recovery awards or programs <br />should be referred to the Federal Awarding Agency. <br />Federal ALYency Review Process <br />3.11 How will agencies obtain recipient data elements? <br />Recovery recipient reporting data will be provided for download by Federal agency and <br />program officials from a central data repository. These files may be used to automate <br />data quality reviews or create agency /program specific reports. Details regarding format <br />and download options are being developed. <br />3.12 What data elements will Federal agencies use to review recipient reports? <br />Federal agencies should develop internal policies and procedures for reviewing reported <br />data. Federal agencies may extract the data elements below to validate recipient reports <br />for compliance, accuracy, and consistency with Federal award data. Automated checks <br />for accuracy may be conducted by comparing recipient data to the award data stored in <br />agency financial systems of record. For example, recipient data may be used to ensure <br />that all Federal agency recipients have submitted reports and to verify that all prime - <br />recipient D -U -N -S reported have actually received Recovery funding. Also, amounts <br />may be validated for consistency to ensure the individual or aggregated values do not <br />exceed the agency amounts awarded or disbursed. Items the Federal agency might <br />consider: <br />• Award Number <br />• Funding Agency Name <br />• D -U -N -S Number <br />• EIN <br />• CFDA <br />• Recipient Organization <br />• Project/Grant Period <br />• Total Cost of Infrastructure Investments <br />• Amount of award Current Value <br />• Amount of Award or Sub Award Ultimate Value (anticipated total amount of <br />cash) <br />• Total amount of Sub awards less than $25,000 <br />• Total Jobs Created/Retained <br />3.13 How will the other data elements be used by Federal agencies? <br />Federal agencies may review additional data elements highlighted below to determine if a <br />prime recipient's report is realistic or will produce expected results. This type of review <br />is more subjective and may need to be conducted manually. For example, the Federal <br />agency may elect to compare data elements for consistency in reporting by comparing the <br />25 <br />