Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Orange County 101 25-29 Regional AFH <br /> <br />• In Irvine, access to low-poverty neighborhoods is higher for all groups compared to <br />the region, including for individuals living below the FPL, and there are no major <br />disparities by race/ethnicity. <br />• In La Habra, access to low-poverty neighborhoods is higher for all groups compared <br />to the region, except for White residents. There are significant disparities in access <br />to low-poverty neighborhoods by race/ethnicity. Hispanic residents have the least <br />access. AAPI residents overall have the most access, however, the AAPI population <br />living below the FPL has significantly less access compared to the overall AAPI <br />population in the city. <br />• In Laguna Niguel, access to low-poverty neighborhoods is higher for all groups <br />compared to the region, including for individuals living below the FPL, and there are <br />no major disparities by race/ethnicity. <br />• In Lake Forest, access to low-poverty neighborhoods is higher for all groups <br />compared to the region. However, some racial/ethnic disparities exist, with Hispanic <br />residents having the least access. For the population living below the FPL, access is <br />much lower for Native American residents compared to any other group, access is <br />lower for AAPI residents compared to the overall AAPI population, and access is <br />higher for Black residents compared to the overall Black population. <br />• In Mission Viejo, access to low-poverty neighborhoods is higher for all groups <br />compared to the region. However, some disparities exist for individuals living below <br />the FPL, with Black residents living below the FPL having less access than other <br />groups in the city (though still with better access compared to the region). <br />• In Newport Beach, access to low-poverty neighborhoods is higher for all groups <br />compared to the region, including for individuals living below the FPL, and there are <br />no major disparities by race/ethnicity. <br />• In Orange, there are similar disparities in access to low-poverty neighborhoods as <br />in the region, though at a smaller scale because all groups, except for White <br />residents, in the city have better access than their counterparts in the region as a <br />whole. Hispanic residents in the city have the least access to low-poverty <br />neighborhoods. Additionally, Black residents living below the FPL have significantly <br />lower access. <br />• In Rancho Santa Margarita, access to low-poverty neighborhoods is higher for all <br />groups compared to the region, and there is little racial/ethnic disparity. For the <br />population living below the FPL, racial/ethnic disparities are larger, mainly because <br />the AAPI population below the FPL has the most access to low-poverty <br />neighborhoods of any group in the city. <br />• In San Clemente, access to low-poverty neighborhoods is higher for all groups <br />compared to the region. However, some racial/ethnic disparities exist, with Hispanic <br />residents experiencing the least access. Disparities are larger for the population <br />EXHIBIT 6