My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 24 - Public Hearing - Amendments to the Transit Zoning Code
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
06/03/2025 Regular
>
Item 24 - Public Hearing - Amendments to the Transit Zoning Code
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2025 5:16:07 PM
Creation date
5/28/2025 4:48:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
24
Date
6/3/2025
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
705
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana - Public Comment Response Matrix for April 1, 2025 City Council Meeting <br />Public Hearing Item No. 22 Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) <br />Comment # <br />Written Public Comment Received <br />Response <br />25 <br />Roger Simon- Business Owner - provided <br />The City acknowledges the comment. <br />comments in opposition to the proposed <br />Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) amendments <br />CEQA requires the City to analyze the Project impacts against <br />with the following claims: <br />the existing environmental setting. As analyzed in the <br />Addendum, the Project is not introducing any new land uses <br />- Claims that the ordinance will reduce <br />that would have air quality impacts. It is instead introducing <br />air pollution are misleading, as the <br />new regulations for nonconforming industrial use that would <br />primary pollution sources are <br />discontinue nonconforming noxious uses, and establish <br />automobiles and trains, not industrial <br />screening walls. These regulations would reduce dust and <br />businesses. <br />lessen air quality emissions from the existing environmental <br />setting. Further, any future development within the TZC area <br />- The claim that the ordinance will <br />requiring discretionary action would continue to be subject to <br />reduce traffic is false, as converting <br />a project -level CEQA review and comply with existing <br />industrial areas to high -density <br />regulations that will ensure potential impacts are not <br />residential use will increase <br />exacerbated. There will be no new or more severe significant <br />construction traffic and automobile <br />impacts to air quality than were previously analyzed in the <br />congestion. <br />TZC EIR, and therefore a subsequent or supplemental EIR <br />is not required. <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.