Laserfiche WebLink
shall retain a cultural resource professional who meets the Secretary of the Interior's <br /> Professional Qualifications Standards for Architectural History to determine if the project would <br /> cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in <br /> Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. The investigation shall include, as determined <br /> appropriate by the cultural resource professional and the City of Santa Ana, the appropriate <br /> archival research, including, if necessary, an updated records search of the South Central <br /> Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System <br /> (CHRIS) and a pedestrian survey of the proposed development area to determine if any <br /> significant historic-period resources would be adversely affected by the proposed <br /> development. The results of the investigation shall be documented in a technical report or <br /> memorandum that identifies and evaluates any historical resources within the development <br /> area and includes recommendations and methods for eliminating or reducing impacts on <br /> historical resources. The technical report or memorandum shall be submitted to the City Santa <br /> Ana for approval. As determined necessary by the City, environmental documentation (e.g., <br /> CEQA documentation) prepared for future development within the project site shall reference <br /> or incorporate the findings and recommendations of the technical report or memorandum. The <br /> project applicant shall be responsible for implementing methods for eliminating or reducing <br /> Impacts on historical resources identified in the technical report or memorandum. Such <br /> methods could include, but not be limited to, written and photographic recordation of the <br /> resource in accordance with the level of Historic American Building Survey (HABS) <br /> documentation that is appropriate to the significance (local, state, national) of the resource. <br /> (Impact 4.4-3) <br /> Project Analysis and Conclusion <br /> The City determined that impacts related to archaeological resources (Impact 4.4-1) unique <br /> paleontological resources (Impact 4.4-2), and disturbing human remains were less than <br /> significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Impacts related to historical <br /> resources (Impact 4.4-3) were found to be significant and unavoidable and that specific <br /> economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no <br /> additional feasible mitigation measures exist that would avoid or substantially reduce these <br /> impacts. <br /> The TZC EIR states that there are 80 designated historic properties that are listed on the <br /> Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties, five that are listed on the California Points of <br /> Historical Interest, and one that is listed on the California Historical Landmarks within and <br /> adjacent to the TZC area. <br /> The TZC area has already been subject to extensive disruption from previous development <br /> and may contain artificial fill materials. The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified <br /> in Table 1 — Current and Proposed Text Regulations would not require preparation of a <br /> supplemental or subsequent EIR because specific development projects are neither included <br /> nor required, nor would the project introduce new land uses that would have impact to cultural <br /> or tribal cultural resources that could otherwise make the long-term significant and unavoidable <br /> historical resource impacts more severe. <br /> Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to <br /> be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual <br /> project. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will <br /> assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. Mitigation measures MM4.4-1(a), MM4.4- <br /> 1(b), MM4.4-2(a), MM4.2(b), and MM4.4-3 would continue to apply. In addition, compliance <br /> with the existing regulations and proposed regulations identified in Table 1 — Current and <br /> January 2025 30 Environmental Analysis <br /> Resolution No. 2025-023 <br /> Page 38 of 65 <br />