Laserfiche WebLink
b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by <br /> the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? <br /> c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a <br /> change in location that results in substantial safety risks? <br /> d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or <br /> dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? <br /> e. Result in inadequate emergency access? <br /> f Result in inadequate parking capacity <br /> g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation <br /> (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks) <br /> TZC EIR Conclusions <br /> • Operation of the proposed project would result in impacts related to neighborhood <br /> traffic in the adjacent residential areas to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD <br /> 8413) area. (Impact 4.11-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) <br /> • Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the implementation of the Transit <br /> Zoning Code would exceed standards established by the Orange County <br /> Transportation Authority within the study area. (Impact 4.11-2: Less Than Significant <br /> without mitigation) <br /> • Development projects constructed pursuant to the standards contained within the <br /> Transit Zoning Code would not result in a change in air traffic patterns. (Impact 4.11-3: <br /> Less Than Significant) without mitigation <br /> • Development projects constructed pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code would not <br /> increase hazards due to a design future or incompatible uses. (Impact 4.11-4: Less <br /> Than Significant without mitigation) <br /> • Development projects constructed pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code could result in <br /> inadequate emergency access. (Impact 4.11-5: Less Than Significant without <br /> mitigation) <br /> • Long-term cumulative development under the implementation of the Transit Zoning <br /> Code would not result in inadequate parking capacity. (Impact 4.11-6: Less Than <br /> Significant without mitigation) <br /> • The Transit Zoning Code would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs <br /> supporting alternative transportation. (Impact 4.11-7: Less Than Significant) <br /> • Long-term cumulative development under implementation of the Transit Zoning Code <br /> would cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic <br /> load and capacity of the street system. (Impact 4.11-8: Less Than Significant with <br /> mitigation) <br /> • Long-term cumulative development under implementation of the Transit Zoning Code <br /> would result in impacts related to freeway ramps in the vicinity of the Transit Zoning <br /> Code area. (impact 4.11-9: Less Than Significant with mitigation and Significant and <br /> Unavoidable due to a public agency (Caltrans) approval other than the City) <br /> TZC EIR Mitigation Measures <br /> January 2025 47 Environmental Analysis <br /> Resolution No. 2025-023 <br /> Page 55 of 65 <br />