My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2025-08-05
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
08/05/2025
>
Agenda Packet_2025-08-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2025 5:11:00 PM
Creation date
7/30/2025 5:07:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
8/5/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
595
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Long-Term Solutions to Short-Term Rentals <br /> <br />2024-2025 Orange County Grand Jury Page 8 <br /> <br />Regardless of the model, neighbors have the expectation that STR businesses will be operated in <br />a responsible and respectful manner. Owner-occupied models make it easier for a neighbor with <br />a complaint to get resolution. In cities that use this model, formal complaints are fewer because <br />neighbors can quickly resolve issues between themselves. <br />Code Enforcement’s Role <br />Code Enforcement (CE) responsibilities include initial and ongoing inspections of STRs to <br />assure adherence to building codes, noise and parking requirements, along with monitoring city <br />complaint portals and searching for nonpermitted STRs. Code Enforcement officers also <br />investigate citizen complaints to substantiate claims and issue citations. <br />Revenue staff work in tandem with CE to process permits and licenses and to collect TOT and <br />other fees. In at least one city that has a waiting list for STR permits, revenue staff rather than <br />CE staff manage the list, which may delay or limit CE’s ability to find unpermitted STRs. <br />Several cities employ third-party platforms offering an array of services, including STR <br />registration portals, a complaints hotline and/or online portal, and tax payment portals. These <br />platforms offer efficient and potentially cost-effective options to aid staff monitoring STRs. <br />Cities may also select a third-party platform option that identifies both permitted and <br />unpermitted STRs advertising on OBAs. <br />STR Policies Vary in Orange County <br />Each of the thirty-four cities in Orange County has its own policies. As of this writing, nineteen <br />of the cities had a ban on all STRs and fifteen allowed STRs (see Table 1). Unincorporated areas <br />of the county (e.g., Rossmoor, North Tustin) are covered by County of Orange policy through <br />the OC Public Works department, which issues permits; however, the Grand Jury did not observe <br />STR volumes in unincorporated areas warranting analysis. <br />Cities With an STR Ban <br />The Grand Jury learned that it is difficult for cities to enforce a ban. Cities report that after they <br />enacted a ban, the volume of STRs saw a notable decline; however, some unpermitted STRs still <br />continued to operate. Cities may use a rental identification database and a complaint portal to <br />improve compliance, often through third-party software. These databases can often identify the <br />address of an unpermitted STR and allow follow-up with the property owner. At least one city <br />with technologically savvy CE staff has performed this task without help from a third-party <br />platform. <br />All cities in the coastal zone have permits for STRs, and this is linked to mandates from the <br />California Coastal Commission (CCC) which issued a 2016 memo with guidance that coastal <br />cities provide “lower cost visitor…facilities” and beach access via STRs. <br /> <br /> <br />City Council 10 – 10 8/5/2025
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.