My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Packet 4.28.25
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2025
>
Packet 4.28.25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2025 9:47:35 AM
Creation date
9/2/2025 9:43:39 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
404
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CEQA Class 32 Exemption – 400 W Warner Ave <br />April 7, 2025 <br />Page 5 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />• Projects which serve the local community and have the potential to reduce VMT, such as <br />neighborhood K-12 schools and local serving retail less than 50,000 SF (Charter schools are excluded <br />from this criteria). <br /> <br />• Projects that generate less than 110 net daily trips. <br /> <br />• Projects located within Transit Priority Areas (TPAs). <br /> <br />o TPAs are defined as a ½ mile radius around an existing or planned major transit stop (e.g. <br />Metrolink Station, Streetcar Station, etc.) or an existing stop along a high quality transit <br />corridor. <br /> <br />o High Quality Transit Areas (HQTAs) are defined as a corridor with fixed route bus service with <br />service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours. A map of HQTAs can <br />be reviewed on SCAG’s website (but should be verified by the engineer/planner related to the <br />criteria for these areas). <br /> <br />o Please note that projects that are in TPAs will also be required to complete a secondary <br />screening step to verify the proposed project’s consistency with the assumptions from the <br />Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). This consistency <br />can be a land use review (e.g. are the proposed land uses already included in the RTP/SCS) or <br />can be reviewed from a VMT/SP perspective (e.g. does the resulting land use increase or <br />decrease the VMT/SP in the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) compared to the RTP/SCS <br />assumptions). <br /> <br />• Projects located in a low-VMT generating TAZ. <br /> <br />As shown in Appendix A of the City’s Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, the Project is located within a TPA.2 <br />Additionally, the Project proposes land use consistent with those permitted by the General Plan, which is <br />consistent with the land uses assumed for the Project site as part of the RTP/SCS. Therefore, the Project would <br />meet the screening threshold for being within a TPA. Additionally, the Project would serve the local community. <br />Therefore, the Project would meet two of the screening thresholds and VMT impacts would be less than <br />significant. <br /> <br />Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />The Project’s Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Assessment is presented as Attachment C to this Memorandum. As <br />shown in Tables 4 and 5 of the Assessment, the Project would not result in an exceedance of the South Coast Air <br />Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) regional significance threshold for construction-source or <br />operational-source emissions. Additionally, as shown in Table 7 of the Assessment, emissions resulting from the <br />construction would not exceed the numerical thresholds of localized significance established by the South Coast <br />AQMD for any criteria pollutant. Moreover, Table 8 of the Assessment shows that the Project would generate a <br />total of approximately 2,018.62 MTCO2e/yr, which would not exceed the SCAQMD’s numeric threshold of <br />significance of 3,000 MTCO2e/yr. <br /> <br />2 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/santaanaca/uploads/2022/03/Santa-Ana-VMT-TIS-Guidelines.pdf <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.