My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 1.22.25
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Zoning Administrator (2009-Present)
>
2025
>
Agenda Packet 1.22.25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2025 2:54:43 PM
Creation date
9/2/2025 2:54:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minor Exception No. 2024-04 (1014 S. Cypress Avenue, Units 100 and 101) <br />January 22, 2025 <br />Page 3 <br />4 <br />7 <br />8 <br />7 <br />In late October 2024, the property owner contacted to the Planning Division indicating <br />that construction progress on the ADUs was delayed due the City’s requirements for <br />undergrounding of new utility connections, as required by SAMC Section 41-626. <br />Moreover, the property owner requested administrative approval for a second <br />connection drop to the ADU. On November 1, 2024, staff provided a response to the <br />property owner indicating that approval of a minor exception is required to allow a <br />second drop in order to construct the project as proposed by the applicant. In November <br />25, 2024, the property owner submitted the required minor exception application for <br />consideration. <br />Project Analysis <br />Pursuant to Section 41-626(a) of the SAMC, all new electrical connections for new <br />buildings or structures are required to be underground. Moreover, pursuant to SAMC <br />Section 41-626(e), a minor exception may be granted from the requirements of <br />subsection 41-626(a), subject to the standards set forth in Section 41-638 of the SAMC. <br />Pursuant to SAMC Section 41-638, the zoning administrator may grant a minor <br />exception when it appears that all of the following have been established: <br />i. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, <br />including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application <br />of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges not <br />otherwise at variance with the intent and purpose of the provisions of this <br />chapter; <br />ii. That the granting of a variance or minor exception is necessary for the <br />preservation and enjoyment of one (1) or more substantial property rights; <br />iii. That the granting of a variance or minor exception will not be materially <br />detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property; and <br />iv. That the granting of a variance or minor exception will not adversely affect the <br />general plan of the city. <br />In analyzing the minor exception request, staff believes that the following analysis <br />warrants staff’s recommendation of denial of the application due the fact that not all of <br />the above-mentioned findings required by the SAMC can be established or <br />substantiated. <br />There exist no special circumstances applicable to the subject property including size, <br />shape, topography, location or surroundings (i.e., property’s physical characteristics), <br />that would justify the granting of the minor exception or that would prohibit the property <br />owner from placing the required utility lines underground. Rather, the location of the <br />existing power pole is such that the undergrounding and trenching of the utility lines is <br />viable and not be obstructed by any of the property’s physical characteristics and, in <br />fact, the amount of undergrounding and trenching of the utility lines would be limited. <br />Moreover, to underground the required utility lines, the property owner does not have to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.