My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 11.7.24
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Historic Resources Commission (2009-Present)
>
2024
>
Agenda Packet 11.7.24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2025 3:52:39 PM
Creation date
9/2/2025 3:51:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO <br />GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 <br />Resolution No. 2024-XX <br />Page 3 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />and replace damaged trim, siding, and fascia may require <br />additional removal of characteristic historic materials, but <br />would replace damaged materials in-kind and only as a last <br />resort, when more conservative repair options are not <br />available. <br /> <br />iii. The project complies with Standard No. 3. The project <br />complies with Standard No. 3. because he proposed changes <br />will not create a false sense of historical development. The <br />project would restore 16 windows (in addition to replacing <br />sashes in three existing non-historic window openings), the <br />historical designs of which could not be confirmed definitively <br />through a review of available documentation. National Park <br />Service guidance recommends that, “the replacement <br />windows may be an accurate restoration using historical, <br />pictorial, and physical documentation; or be a new design that <br />is compatible with the window openings and the historic <br />character of the building.” Even in the absence of relevant <br />documentation, it can be safely assumed, based on the age <br />and architectural style of the Dinsmore House, the building’s <br />windows originally included wood sashes in fixed and double- <br />hung configurations. The operability of each specific window <br />would be retained with each replacement. Further, in the <br />absence of definitive documentation, the project proposes <br />simple single-light fixed and one-over-one hung sashes, <br />which would be consistent with the relatively modest <br />character of the building. <br /> <br />As proposed, the replacement of the back porch handrail <br />would remove a non-historic metal feature of incompatible <br />design and replace it with a new handrail whose wood <br />material and overall design and appearance would be based <br />on the existing historic hand rails located at the front of the <br />house and would therefore be consistent with the hi storical <br />development of the house. <br /> <br />iv. As conditioned, the project complies with Standard No. 5. <br />Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction <br />techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize <br />the property will be preserved. Modifications to the historic <br />window surrounds and repairs and replacement of historic <br />trim, siding, and fascia would generally involve the loss of only <br />minimal amounts of historic fabric and, where work would <br />require replacement, would be completed in-kind with <br />materials consistent with the house’s historic character. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.