My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-041 - Certifing Final Supplemental Enviromental Impact for The Village
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2025
>
2025-041 - Certifing Final Supplemental Enviromental Impact for The Village
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2025 9:52:20 AM
Creation date
9/25/2025 9:50:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
28
Date
9/16/2025
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WQMP (for development and redevelopment projects), and BMPs to eliminate or reduce the <br /> discharge of pollutants in stormwater discharges, reduce runoff, reduce erosion and <br /> sedimentation, and increase filtration and infiltration.The NPDES permit requirements have been <br /> set by the SWRCB and implemented by the RWQCB and the Orange County DAMP to reduce <br /> incremental effects of individual projects so that they would not result in significant <br /> cumulative impacts. <br /> Additionally, the projected water demand from the GPU at buildout, which includes the Project, is <br /> well within the projected total water demand for 2040 in the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan <br /> for normal, dry year, and multiple dry year scenarios. Additionally, as the other related projects in <br /> the cities of Irvine and Costa Mesa are within the OC Basin, it is assumed that the projected total <br /> water demand for 2040 in the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for normal, dry year, and <br /> multiple dry year scenarios would be sufficient for the related projects. Further, mandatory <br /> compliance with each city's Municipal Code would ensure that buildout of the GPU, the related <br /> projects, and the Project would result in less than significant cumulative impacts related to <br /> flood hazards. <br /> Therefore, the Project's contribution to cumulative impacts related to hydrology and water quality <br /> would not be cumulatively considerable. Impacts would be less than significant. (Draft <br /> Supplemental EIR, pp. 4.7-23—4.7-25.) <br /> 4.11 LAND USE AND PLANNING <br /> Threshold LU-1: The Project would not physically divide an established community. <br /> Findings: The City finds that the Project would result in less than significant impacts to land use <br /> and planning related to physically dividing an established community. (Draft Supplemental EIR, <br /> pp. 4.8-20 —4.8-21.) <br /> Additionally, the City finds that the Project will implement the following regulatory requirement <br /> (Draft Supplemental EIR, pp. 4.8-8—4.8-9): <br /> RR LU-1: Development associated with the General Plan Update would be designed and <br /> constructed in accordance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the <br /> City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. Development within specific plan areas, overlay areas, <br /> and specific development districts would implement zoning and development standards <br /> that are applicable within these subareas in addition to those in the underlying zoning <br /> district. <br /> RR HAZ-7: Development will be designed and constructed in accordance with the airport <br /> environs land use plan (AELUP) for John Wayne Airport. Building height restrictions, as <br /> specified in the AELUP, would apply in the city <br /> Explanation of the Rationale: The Project implements land uses and activities that were <br /> envisioned and analyzed in the GPU PEIR. The Project site is currently developed with 164,049 <br /> square feet of commercial uses, which comprises approximately 22 percent of the 17.2-acre site. <br /> Resolution No. 2025-041 <br /> Page 45 of 140 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.