My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-041 - Certifing Final Supplemental Enviromental Impact for The Village
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2025
>
2025-041 - Certifing Final Supplemental Enviromental Impact for The Village
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2025 9:52:20 AM
Creation date
9/25/2025 9:50:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
28
Date
9/16/2025
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Explanation of the Rationale: The rationale and facts supporting the above finding are fully <br /> developed in Section 4.1, Air Quality, pages 4.1-48 through 4.1-51 of the Draft Supplemental EIR. <br /> The following presents a summary of that rationale: <br /> The Project would not have a considerable contribution to cumulative impacts related to <br /> consistency with applicable air quality plans or regional and localized emissions with the <br /> implementation of Project-Specific MM AQ-1, to reduce the Project's operational emissions of <br /> VOCs and its contribution of ozone precursors to the SCAB to below the SCAQMD's threshold of <br /> significance. Additionally, GPU PEIR MM AQ-1 would require the use of construction equipment <br /> rated by the USEPA as having Tier 4 emissions limits for engines between 50 and 750 <br /> horsepower to reduce the carcinogenic and acute hazard risks. Therefore, cumulative impacts <br /> related to consistency with applicable air quality plans and regional and localized emissions were <br /> determined to be less than significant after mitigation. <br /> 5.2 CULTURAL RESOURCES <br /> Threshold C-2 The Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the <br /> significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to State CEQA <br /> Guidelines Section 15064.5 with the implementation of mitigation. <br /> Findings: The City finds that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, <br /> the Project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified <br /> in the Final Supplemental EIR. Specifically, the City finds that the following mitigation measure <br /> shall be implemented to reduce potentially significant cultural resource impacts resulting from the <br /> Project (Draft Supplemental EIR, pp. 4,2-15—4.2-16): <br /> GPU PEIR MM CUL-6: If the archaeological assessment did not identify archaeological <br /> resources but found the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological resources, a <br /> qualified archaeologist and a Native American monitor approved by a California Native <br /> American Tribe identified by the Native American Heritage Commission as culturally <br /> affiliated with the project area shall monitor all ground-disturbing construction and pre- <br /> construction activities in areas with previously undisturbed soil of high sensitivity. The <br /> archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the <br /> proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held <br /> in conjunction with the project's initial on-site safety meeting and shall explain the <br /> importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. The <br /> Native American monitor shall be invited to participate in this training. In the event that <br /> archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground-disturbing <br /> activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted <br /> while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the <br /> Secretary's Standards. and This will include tribal consultation and coordination with the <br /> Native American monitor in the case of a prehistoric archaeological resource or tribal <br /> resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any <br /> collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where <br /> Resolution No. 2025-041 <br /> Page 72 of 140 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.