Laserfiche WebLink
of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable based on <br /> specific overriding considerations found in Chapter 8 below. <br /> Explanation of the Rationale: The rationale and facts supporting the above finding are fully <br /> developed in Section 4.12, Recreation, pages 4.12-15 through 4.12-18 of the Draft Supplemental <br /> EIR. The following presents a summary of that rationale: <br /> Together with the contribution from the Project's maximum buildout of 3,815 persons and 7.5 <br /> acres of publicly accessible parks/recreation facilities and open space,the Project plus the related <br /> projects would result in a total of 14,273 persons and 21.4 acres of publicly accessible <br /> park/recreation facilities and open space, for a ratio of 1.5 acres per 1,005 residents. While the <br /> Project and the related projects would improve the GPU buildout's parkland-per-resident ratio and <br /> would be required to provide park and recreational facilities and/or pay in-lieu fees as required by <br /> the municipal code, due to the lack of available land to develop new parks or expand existing <br /> facilities, the ratio would still remain below the CPU's parkland standard. For this reason, the <br /> Project's incremental contribution relating to the deficiency of parkland within the City would be <br /> cumulatively considerable. No feasible mitigation measures were identified in the GPU EIR to <br /> reduce this impact to a less than significant level and there remain no feasible mitigation <br /> measures.While the Project's incremental contribution to cumulative impacts related to recreation <br /> would improve the existing cumulative scenario and the impacts identified in the GPU PEIR, <br /> cumulative impacts to recreation resources would remain significant and unavoidable. <br /> i <br /> Resolution No. <br /> 2025-041 <br /> Page 91 of 140 <br />