My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-043 - Overruling the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission's
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2025
>
2025-043 - Overruling the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission's
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2025 10:38:51 AM
Creation date
9/25/2025 10:38:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
28
Date
9/16/2025
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
including landing and takeoff of aircraft. In addition, if <br /> the Project is for noise compatibility program <br /> implementation, it will not cause or permit any change <br /> in land use, within its jurisdiction, that will reduce its <br /> compatibility, with respect to the airport, of the noise <br /> compatibility program measures upon which Federal <br /> funds have been expended. <br /> M. If the ALUC does not agree with any FAA Determination, they can <br /> petition the FAA. <br /> 1) As per 14 CFR Section 77.35 (a) "You may petition the FAA <br /> official that issued the Determination of No Hazard to Air <br /> Navigation to revise or reconsider the determination based on <br /> new facts or to extend the effective period of the <br /> determination, provided that: (1) Actual structural work of the <br /> proposed construction or alteration, such as the laying of a <br /> foundation, but not including excavation, has not been started; <br /> and (2) The petition is submitted at least 15 days before the <br /> expiration date of the Determination of No Hazard to Air <br /> Navigation." <br /> 2) Further, and as per 14 CFR Section 77.37 (a) "If you are the <br /> sponsor, provided a substantive aeronautical comment on a <br /> proposal in an aeronautical study, or have a substantive <br /> aeronautical comment on the proposal but were not given an <br /> opportunity to state it, you may petition the FAA for a <br /> discretionary review of a determination, revision, or extension <br /> of a determination issued by the FAA." <br /> 4. Overflight. "Close to the JWA approach centerline" as identified by the <br /> ALUC is neither an FAA nor an AELUP standard. <br /> a. The FAA is the only authoritative source of aviation safety data and <br /> the FAA does not have a "close to the JWA approach centerline" <br /> standard. <br /> b. The AELUP clearly identifies its airport land use planning standards <br /> around aircraft noise, safety, and height. Objective measures of <br /> these standards are clearly identified in AELUP Section 2.1. The <br /> Specific Plan is drafted to be consistent with each of these objective <br /> standards. <br /> C. Two-dimensional flight tracks do not inform the impact of overflights. <br /> The ALUC provided limited arrival and departure flight tracks in its <br /> ALUC staff report. <br /> d. Aircraft noise contours used to objectively measure noise impact <br /> already assume flight tracks and actual operating conditions for a full <br /> year including future operations. Limited information presented <br /> within the staff report packet dated June 19, 2025 of arrival flight <br /> tracks and limited information on departure flight tracks are not <br /> Resolution No. 2025-043 <br /> Page 19 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.