Item 14 - Award of a Construction Contract for Bristol St and Memory Lane Intersection

Home Browse Search

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 1 -E883 projected capacity to serve residents and businesses until approximately 2030.17 ❑linda's average disposal rate is nearly 7;000 tons per day (TPD), although it permitted up to 8,000 TPD. Thus, these facilities have adequate landfill capacity to serve the proposed Project and no new significant environmental impact would result from the Project implementation: Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIRMitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. g) Comply with federa4 state, aind local statutes and reguladiorns related to solid wave? Refer to Response 3.18(f). The proposed Project would comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. The Project would comply with the City of Santa Ana's established reduction, reuse, and recycling programs. No new significant solid waste impact would result from the proposed Project. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISMIR mitigation measures are applicable — Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 3.19 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Based on this Addendum,. the proposed Project has not substantially changed in regard to the setting, design, impacts, and mitigation measures as described in the 1990 FEISIEIR New circumstances or new information, including any new or revised environmental laws, regulations, or policies have not modified the impacts of the proposed Project aj Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the enviroumen4 substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or ivildVe species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self'- sustaiuing levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substaintial& reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Californk history or prehistory? The proposed Project would not result in impacts beyond those identified in the 1990 FEISIEIR in this regard, and does not have the potential to degrade the environment, reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, threaten plant or animal communities, reduce or restrict endangered plant or animal species or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory with compliance with the 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures. b) Does the project have impacts that are irndividually limiters but cumuladvely considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects,) ? Given the nature and scope of the proposed Project, and in consideration of mitigation measures that are included in the 1990 FEISIEl& the Project would not involve impacts that are cumulatively considerable. c} Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse e,,(f eets on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Construction -related activities are anticipated to have some relatively minor, temporary impacts which can be mitigated with implementation of measures included in the 1990 FELSIEIR Furthermore,. potential Iong-term (operational) impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels through implementation of required 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures. 17 Orange County Waste and Recycling, Olinda Alpha Landfall, http:/Avww.o6landfiUs,coni/landfiU/active/ olindalandfill, accessed October 16, 2017. Final I December 2017 3-30 Environmental Consequences