My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 22 - Public Hearing Ordinance Second Reading - General Plan Amendment, Zoo Overflow Parking Rezone
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
03/17/2026 Regular, Special HA
>
Item 22 - Public Hearing Ordinance Second Reading - General Plan Amendment, Zoo Overflow Parking Rezone
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2026 8:13:49 AM
Creation date
3/11/2026 9:15:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
22
Date
3/17/2026
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SANTA ANA REZONE PROJECT <br />INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />Based on the traffic analysis prepared for the proposed project,61 the project site driveway currently <br />generates an average of 246 two-way trips per day, with 24 trips during the AM peak -hour and 20 <br />trips during the PM peak -hour. Based on the air quality modeling performed for this project, <br />construction of the proposed project would generate a maximum of 119 total trips per day during any <br />phase of project construction; 104 of these trips would be truck haul trips. This equates to less than <br />15 total trips per hour over the course of a standard construction workday. Typically, an approximate <br />doubling of traffic volumes is required to cause 3 dBA noise increases, which are considered barely <br />noticeable. The proposed project's addition of less than 15 total trips per hour would not double <br />existing hourly trips on roadway segments accessing the project site. As such, the proposed project's <br />maximum daily construction trips would not result in noticeable (much less substantial) noise <br />increases along surrounding roadways and this impact would be less than significant. <br />Construction Equipment Noise <br />Construction is completed in discrete steps, each of which has its own mix of equipment and, <br />consequently, its own noise characteristics. These various sequential phases would change the <br />character of the noise generated on the site and, therefore, the noise levels surrounding the site as <br />construction progresses. Despite the variety in the type and size of construction equipment, <br />similarities in the dominant noise sources and patterns of operation allow construction -related noise <br />ranges to be categorized by work phase. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction <br />equipment may involve 1 or 2 minutes of full power operation followed by 3 or 4 minutes at lower <br />power settings. Impact equipment such as pile drivers is not being used during construction of the <br />proposed project. <br />The site preparation phase, which includes excavation and grading of the site, tends to generate the <br />highest noise levels because the noisiest construction equipment is earthmoving equipment. <br />Earthmoving equipment includes excavating machinery and compacting equipment, such as <br />bulldozers, draglines, backhoes, front loaders, roller compactors, scrapers, and graders. Typical <br />operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve 1 or 2 minutes of full power <br />operation followed by 3 or 4 minutes at lower power settings. <br />Construction of the project requires the use of graders, excavators, dozers, front end loaders, and <br />backhoes. The maximum noise level generated by each bulldozer, excavator, and grader is assumed <br />to be 85 dBA Lmax at 50 feet from this equipment. A characteristic of sound is that each doubling of <br />sound sources with equal strength increases a sound level by 3 dBA. Assuming that each piece of <br />construction equipment operates at some distance from the other equipment, a reasonable worst - <br />case combined noise level during this phase of construction would be 90 dBA Lmax at a distance of 50 <br />feet from the acoustic center of a construction area. This would result in a reasonable worst -case <br />hourly average of 86 dBA Leq. <br />The closest noise -sensitive receptors to the project site are single-family residences located south of <br />the project site. The closest residence would be located approximately 160 feet from the acoustic <br />61 Urban Crossroads, Inc. 2025. Santa Ana Rezone Trip Generation Assessment. July 23. <br />80 FCS <br />Https://adecinnovaticns.sharepoint.com/sites/PubiicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client(PN-JN)/0327/03270047/ISMND/03270047 Santa Ana Rezone Project ISMND.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.