My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 08 - Ballot Measure Polling Results
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
03/17/2026 Regular, Special HA
>
Item 08 - Ballot Measure Polling Results
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2026 11:01:15 AM
Creation date
3/11/2026 10:04:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Manager's Office
Item #
08
Date
3/17/2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br />i <br />what was found in the survey of voters for a particular question and what would have been found <br />if all of the estimated 78,658 likely November 2026 voters identified in the city had been sur- <br />veyed for the study. <br />Figure 17 provides a graphic plot of the maximum margin of error in this study. The maximum <br />margin of error for a dichotomous percentage result occurs when the answers are evenly split <br />such that 50% provide one response and 50% provide the alternative response. For this survey, <br />the maximum margin of error is ± 3.9% at the 95% confidence level. <br />FIGURE 17 MAXIMUM MARGIN OF ERROR DUE TO SAMPLING <br />14% <br />12% <br />0 <br />w 8% <br />0 <br />c <br />6% <br />ro <br />4% <br />2% <br />0% <br />0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 <br />Sample Size (Number of Respondents) <br />Within this report, figures and tables show how responses to certain questions varied by sub- <br />groups such as age, gender, and partisan affiliation. Figure 17 is thus useful for understanding <br />how the maximum margin of error for a percentage estimate will grow as the number of individ- <br />uals asked a question (or in a particular subgroup) shrinks. Because the margin of error grows <br />exponentially as the sample size decreases, the reader should use caution when generalizing <br />and interpreting the results for small subgroups. <br />RFC'RIIITINC. % nATA r01 I FC'TION The survey followed a mixed -method design that <br />employed multiple recruiting methods (telephone, text, and email) and multiple data collection <br />methods (telephone and online). Telephone interviews averaged 17 minutes in length and were <br />conducted during weekday evenings (5:30PM to 9PM) and on weekends (1 OAM to 5PM). It is stan- <br />dard practice not to call during the day on weekdays because most working adults are unavail- <br />able and thus calling during those hours would likely bias the sample. <br />Voters recruited via email and text were assigned a unique passcode to ensure that only voters <br />who received an invitation could access the online survey site, and that each voter could com- <br />V <br />Q <br />0 <br />i;�;d <br />City of Santa Ana True North Research, Inc. © 2025 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.