Laserfiche WebLink
SANTA ANA REZONE PROJECT <br /> INITIAL STUDYIMITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> site as recorded in the CNDDB and CNPS Inventory (Appendix B). Therefore, no impacts to sensitive <br /> or special-status species would occur. <br /> b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural <br /> community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the <br /> California Department of Fish and Wildlife or United States Fish and Wildlife <br /> Service? <br /> No impact. The area surrounding the project site is fully developed. The project site does not contain <br /> any naturally occurring vegetation communities that could be considered sensitive, including riparian <br /> habitat. Therefore, no impact would occur. <br /> c) Have a substantial adverse effect on State or federally protected wetlands <br /> (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)through direct <br /> removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? <br /> No impact.The project site occurs in an urbanized area in the City, and no wetlands or other <br /> hydrological features that meet criteria as waters of the United States or waters of the State are <br /> present within the proposed project site.Additionally, the project site is not located adjacent to any <br /> known potentially jurisdictional water body.According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service <br /> (NRCS)Web Soil Survey (WSS),2li one soil type is mapped on the project site, Mocha loam. These <br /> soils are not known to support vernal pools. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would <br /> not result in impacts to State or federally protected wetlands, including vernal pools. No impact would <br /> occur. <br /> d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or <br /> wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or <br /> impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? <br /> Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. The project site is developed and is <br /> surrounded by urbanized areas, roads, and highways on all sides that limit wildlife movement through <br /> the project site. The project site itself does not serve as a wildlife movement corridor. <br /> The project site contains vegetation that could provide suitable nesting habitat for bird species <br /> protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Fish and Game Code. If ground- <br /> disturbing or vegetation-removing construction activities are initiated during the nesting season, they <br /> could disturb nesting and breeding birds on the ground surface, in trees and shrubs, and on <br /> structures on and adjacent to the project site, which would be considered a significant impact under <br /> CEQA. Potential construction-related project impacts on migratory birds include destruction of eggs or <br /> occupied nests, mortality of young, and causing parental abandonment of nests with eggs or pre- <br /> fledged young birds. With the implementation of Mitigation Measure (MM) 1310-1a and MM B10-1b, <br /> potential project impacts to nesting native and migratory birds would be reduced to a less than <br /> significant level. <br /> 6 Natural Resources Conservation service(NRCS).2D25.Web Soil Survey(WSS). United States Department of <br /> Agriculture(USDA).Website:https:llwebsoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoi[Survey.aspx.Accessed April 23,2025. <br /> FCS n 39 <br /> Hdps:(fade[inppYaFI6n5.Shareppint.cpm/sites/Publfcations5ite)Shared Document,/Publi eons/Menl[PN-INI/0327/03274 7/ISMND/032700475,n Ana Rezone Pro,4�W0mce No. NS-3092 <br /> Page 51 of 118 <br />