Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT 2 <br /> Santa Ana Blvd. Grade Separation <br /> • Caltrans' Carbon Monoxide (CO) protocol screening procedure demonstrated that <br /> the project would not have a material effect on localized CO concentrations; <br /> • the proposed project is not considered a project of air quality concern, as defined by <br /> 40 CFR 93.123(b)(1), and as such, a qualitative PM2.5/PM10 (particulate matter 2.5 <br /> and 10 microns or less in diameter) hot-spot evaluation is not required. It is unlikely <br /> that the proposed project would generate new air quality violations, worsen existing <br /> violations, or delay attainment of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) <br /> for PM2.5 or PM10; and <br /> • the proposed project was found to have no potential for significant mobile-source air <br /> toxics (MSAT) emissions (using FHWA guidance) and is not linked with any special <br /> MSAT concern. <br /> Proposed avoidance and/or minimization measures include: <br /> AQ-1 The project would conform to Caltrans' construction requirements, as specified in <br /> the Caltrans' Standard Specifications, Section 7-1.01 F (Air Pollution Control): "The <br /> Contractor shall comply with all air pollution control ordinances and statutes which apply to <br /> any work performed pursuant to the contract, including any air pollution control rules, <br /> regulations, ordinances and statutes, specified in Section 11017 of the Government Code." <br /> AQ-2 The proposed project, although not a large operation under the Rule's definition <br /> would be required to implement measures for each source of PM10 emissions, as specified <br /> in SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) Implementation Handbook. <br /> 6.3 Initial Site Assessment (ISA): <br /> Table 5 lists identified or potential environmental concerns based on site reconnaissance <br /> and review of historical information sources regarding the acquisition and temporary <br /> construction easement parcels (BOLD = Recognized Environmental Condition): <br /> Follow up Phase I Environmental Site Assessments were conducted on the area along <br /> Fuller Street north of Fruit Street, the County maintenance facility and the industrial <br /> buildings at the south end of the acquisition area, south of Sixth Street. Additional Phase II <br /> Environmental Site Assessment was also performed on 1111 and 1143 Fruit Street (A-9). <br /> The result of the Phase II Site Assessment did not indicate significant soil impacts that <br /> would require remediation. However, access to the remaining properties has limited further <br /> analysis. As a result, the following recommendations were made to be completed at a later <br /> date: <br /> HAZ-1 A Phase II Environmental Site Assessment is recommended during the final design <br /> phase for parts of the study area as follows: parcel A-1 (1024 Fuller): currently the auto <br /> repair shop: sampling if indicated (interior inspection required); parcel A-2 (1022 Fuller): <br /> former machine shop with degreaser, auto wrecking and auto repair shop; parcel A-4 (1020 <br /> Fuller): former paint manufacturer, former auto body shop, former metals recovery facility; <br /> parcel A-5 (1016 Fuller): former machine shop; parcel A-6 (1012 Fuller): former paint spray <br /> booth, former paint manufacturer (Jasco Chemical); parcel A-7 (1008 Fuller): Jasco <br /> Chemical. The Phase II ESA would include soil sampling for petroleum hydrocarbons, <br /> volatile organic compounds, heavy metals and/or those chemicals formerly stored on site by <br /> Jasco Chemical, as appropriate for each individual location. <br /> PROJECT REPORT EQUIVALENT 15 <br />