My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
06/02/2026 Regular
>
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2026 4:38:18 PM
Creation date
6/1/2026 3:57:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L. SUE LOFTIN <br /> Via Electronic Transfer Only (scarvalho(a�santa-ana.org) <br /> Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney <br /> City of Santa Ana <br /> 20 Civic Center Plaza <br /> Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br /> Re: Kingsley Management Company-April 21, 2026 Hearing- Response to Resident <br /> Dear City Attorney Carvalho, <br /> This correspondence is sent on behalf of Kingsley Management Company("KMC") as its General <br /> Counsel. My preference was to discuss the issues with you, but you were not available. Your <br /> schedule, I am sure, is quite demanding. The goal of this correspondence is to open the door to <br /> communication and cooperation between KMC and the City. Kingsley is making this request for <br /> the benefit of the Community, including the residents, employees and vendors who are negatively <br /> impacted by the actions of some residents. <br /> I have reviewed the video of the April 21,2026 Hearing.Your position at the hearing—that certain <br /> aspects of the relationship between a mobilehome park owner/operator and homeowners and other <br /> approved residents cannot be regulated by a local jurisdiction—was legally correct,thank you. We <br /> also acknowledge that taking that position can be difficult and, at times, unpleasant. Your <br /> commitment to the law was commendable, and Kingsley appreciates the City's efforts to inform <br /> homeowners and approved residents about available assistance options. <br /> The purpose of this letter is to provide a limited factual discussion and, more importantly,to foster <br /> productive communication between Kingsley and the City for the benefit of the that relationship <br /> and for residents and its employees and vendors. <br /> However, the comments about Kingsley were troubling because of their express and implied <br /> meaning. Statements such as "I'm not particularly a fan of Kingsley," "Kingsley sued us twice," <br /> "Kingsley has been difficult to work with," "Kingsley does not have the best reputation in the <br /> state," and that you will "make sure the management company complies" with the law are <br /> concerning. The unintended impact of such comments on certain persons can result in harassment <br /> of and in harmful actions to the subject of those types of comments. <br /> Kingsley was and has been portrayed negatively for filing two lawsuits against the City. Those <br /> actions arose from provisions of the Ordinances that Kingsley contended were preempted by, or <br /> conflicted with,state and federal laws governing mobilehome parks.You acknowledged those laws <br /> 000m oMUoo®o®0000®®oomoo 0000®MUoo ®M®oo <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.