My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
06/02/2026 Regular
>
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2026 4:38:18 PM
Creation date
6/1/2026 3:57:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sonia Carvalho, Santa Ana City Attorney <br /> 00�?®®� <br /> are binding on the City and limit the City's jurisdiction at the hearing. Before filing suit,Kingsley <br /> provided detailed written notice for each hearing identifying the specific provisions at issue, and <br /> its objections to the Ordinances were directed to those provisions, not to rent control itself, <br /> Kingsley acknowledged in writing to the City and in the Pleadings the City's authority to adopt a <br /> lawful rent control ordinance. Kingsley also sought to negotiate before and during the litigation to <br /> avoid the time and expense of court proceedings, including requesting a stay after the first <br /> amendment to allow discussions; that request was denied, requiring Kingsley to either file to <br /> preserve its rights or forgo them. Ultimately, the City amended and readopted the Ordinances in <br /> ways that addressed many of the issues raised in the Complaints (previously presented at the <br /> hearings considering the Ordinances) rendering those sections of the Complaints moot. In short, <br /> Kingsley did sue the City twice, but both matters could have been avoided had the Ordinance <br /> initially complied with state and federal law. From Kingsley's perspective, the City was difficult <br /> to work with, declined to meet to discuss the issues, and did not engage meaningfully in settlement <br /> discussions but did amend the Complaints. The City acknowledged the illegal and conflicting <br /> provisions effectively resolving those issues through the amendments thereby making sections of <br /> the litigation moot confirming Kingsley's position was correct. <br /> Kingsley is a privately owned company, not a public or large corporate entity. Its ownership <br /> structure supports a community-focused approach that considers residents' interests, and the <br /> employees and vendors interests. Kingsley complies with laws governing mobilehome park <br /> communities and,like all park owners, is required to comply with the Mobilehome Residency Law <br /> and with the Mobilehome Park Act and related regulations to enforce Title 25. The records for the <br /> residents who are contesting their evictions will substantiate Kingsley's compliance. Your <br /> statement that you will "make sure the management company complies" suggests you believe <br /> Kingsley did not comply. <br /> With due respect, the request is the comments that were made as set forth above or similar <br /> comments not be repeated and as the opportunity presents itself, are corrected. <br /> Looking forward to sharing with you and your office a positive and beneficial relationship for all <br /> concerned with the Mobilehome Park Communities. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> L. Sue Loftin, Esq. <br /> 6965 El Camino Real, 4105-599, Carlsbad, CA 92009 • (760) 607-7340 • sue@lsloftin.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.