My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25G - ENGINEERING SRVS GRADE SEPARATION
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2011
>
01/04/2011
>
25G - ENGINEERING SRVS GRADE SEPARATION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 3:55:46 PM
Creation date
1/4/2011 7:05:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
25G
Date
1/4/2011
Destruction Year
2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> AECIIV <br /> <br /> Climate Change/Greenhouse Gas Emissions. A project. If components are added to the project that are <br /> quantification ofoperational-period greenhouse gas not related to the grade separation then the statutory <br /> (GHG) emissions associated with implementation of the exemption may not apply and additional work not <br /> proposed project will be conducted. Consistent with covered in this scope and cost, including a CEQA <br /> current Caltrans policy, construction-period GHG document, may be required. <br /> emissions will not be quantified. Operations-period <br /> GHG emissions will be quantified using regional daily <br /> peak-period and non-peak-period vehicle miles traveled <br /> (VMT) apportioned into 5 mph speed bins for speeds A Notice of Exemption (NOE) will be prepared and <br /> between 5 mph and 75 mph; and the CT-EMFAC provided to the City for approval and submittal to the <br /> emissions model. ICF Jones & Stokes will present a State Clearinghouse. This notice starts the statue of <br /> comparison of GHG emissions associated with the Build limitations under CEQA so it is recommended that the <br /> Alternative(s) to the No-build Alternative to characterize City file this notice. No additional CEQA documentation <br /> effects of the proposed project on GHG emissions. The beyond the completion of the NOE form is assumed as <br /> analysis of climate change also will also incorporate the part of this scope and cost. <br /> most recent guidance found on the Caltrans Standard Based on the environmental technical studies <br /> Environmental Reference and Caltrans annotated previously discussed a Categorical Exclusion (CE) will be <br /> outline. prepared pursuant to NEPA. ICF Jones & Stokes will <br /> prepare the CE in compliance with the latest format <br /> Air Quality ConformityAnalysis Reportand Checklist. identified on Caltrans Standard Environmental <br /> Under NEPA delegation, the federal air quality Reference website. In addition, the Categorical <br /> conformity determination has not been delegated to Exclusion Checklist will be prepared. <br /> Caltrans and must be made by FHWA. We will prepare a As part of the CE a detailed project description will be <br /> separate Air Quality Conformity Analysis using the included. The CE will also include a very brief (two to <br /> annotated outline for this report on the SER at the time three sentence) summary of the findings of each of the <br /> that the report is initiated and will also prepare the technical studies. No separate environmental <br /> Conformity Checklist based on the checklist that is document is assumed to be prepared to support the CE <br /> available on the SER at the time that the Air Quality and none is included in this scope and cost. <br /> Conformity Analysis Report is prepared. It is assumed that ICF Jones & Stokes will revise the CE <br /> twice based on commentsfromtheCityand Caltrans (to <br /> SCAG Transportation Conformity WorkingGroup. The be reviewed concurrently). <br /> required TCWG form will be completed and submitted <br /> for forwarding to SCAG for inclusion on the agenda for Environmental Commitments Record <br /> determining if the project is a project of air quality For the project an environmental commitments record <br /> concern (POAQC). It is assumed the project will be (ECR) will be prepared in a matrix table format. The ECR <br /> found to not be a POAQC and that no specific analysis will be submitted to the City and Caltrans in hard copy <br /> will be required related to the TCWG determination and electronic form. The matrix table will include a <br /> other than what is already included in this scope of description of each mitigation measure organized by <br /> work. topic numbered to correspond with the impacts. For <br /> each mitigation measure, the Reporting Process, Timing <br /> Mitigation Measures. ICF Jones & Stokes will develop of Measure, Responsible Party, and Verification of <br /> mitigation measures, where applicable, to address Compliance will be identified through coordination with <br /> significant air quality impacts, if present. resource agencies and experience on other similar <br /> projects. The ECR will be included with the CE and it is <br /> assumed that this document will be reviewed as part of <br /> For the proposed project it is assn med that the N EPA the City and Caltrans review of the CE. <br /> document to be prepared will be a Categorical Exclusion <br /> with technical studies. Railroad grade separations are Deliverables (S Copies Each).• <br /> identified as NEPA Categorical Exclusions under 23 CFR Notice ofExemption <br /> 771.117(4). Railroad grade separations are statutorily Draftand Final Categorical Exclusion and <br /> exempt from CEQA, as identified in Section 21080.13 of MMRP <br /> the Public Resources Code and in Section 15282(8) of <br /> the CEQA Guidelines. Statutorily exempt projects are <br /> excused entirely from the environmental review process <br /> and the requirements of CEQA. In addition, all activities <br /> performed to support these projects are also included in If for some reason a NEPA CE were found to be not <br /> the exemption. It is assumed that all project appropriate for the proposed project then an <br /> components are associated with the railroad grade Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant <br /> separation and would be covered under the exemption. Impact (EA/FONSI) would be prepared. Under this <br /> Therefore, it is assumed that no CEQA document or scenario the previously identified Section 4.0 <br /> documentation will be required forthe proposed (Environmental Document) scope would be replaced <br /> r~i f~, <br /> fr. ~~,.~~.o~, <br /> <br /> Ii:~ir~l~~s~l fir p:~r~Ue~~ t~~y Re~~~r~: ~;q~uiiv~~e~~: ire ~ I::' i p:~l~ins fair <br /> <br /> w,~~~ ir~~ Il~~l~v~ir~ r~~ e ~~~r~~~'i~n I~° r~"e~~~ <br /> ~ ~ ' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.