Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> AECII <br /> <br /> with this Section 4.0 scope of work. In addition, the Revised Draft EA <br /> following modifications would be made to the meeting Second Revised Draft EA <br /> and project management tasks for the project. Final Draft EA forapproval/concurrence <br /> • Final Draft EA 30 hard copies and one <br /> electronic (pdfJ Draft EA for a vailability <br /> (including the 75 copies for submittal to the <br /> Draft Environmental Assessment State Clearinghouse) (Volume 7J; ~SCDs with <br /> It is assumed that if a NEPA CE is not agreed upon by technical studies; ~OOCDs with Final Draft ED <br /> Caltrans then the appropriate document for the Itis assumed that up to 700 notices will be <br /> proposed project will be an Environmental Assessment distributed. <br /> (EA) followed by a Finding of No Significant Impact <br /> (FONSI). If a higher-level document is required then a <br /> separate scope and fee will be provided for preparing <br /> the increased level of documentation. While the final Draft EA is being reviewed by the City and <br /> Caltrans a Notice of EA Availability and Notice of <br /> Utilizing the information contained in the technical Opportunity for Public Hearing announcing the <br /> reports, along with additional information and analyses publication of the EA will be prepared for publication. <br /> that are performed, as necessary, a Screencheck Draft The notice will also identify the date, time, and location <br /> EA will be prepared based on the current version of the for the public information meeting that is to beheld. <br /> NEPA-only document annotated outline that is available This notice will be submitted to the City and Caltrans for <br /> at the time that the document is initiated. The review and comment. A public hearing would beheld for <br /> Screencheck Draft EA will be submitted to the City and the project if a request for a public hearing were <br /> Caltrans for review. Along with the Screencheck Draft received in response to the Notice of Opportunity. It is <br /> EA, the external QA/QC form and environmental not anticipated that a public hearing will be requested <br /> document checklist will be prepared and submitted. or required. ICF Jones & Stokes will coordinate the <br /> The QA/QC form and checklist are assumed to be publication of the Notice in an English and Spanish <br /> included with each submittal. language newspaper; however, it is assumed that the <br /> City will be responsible for paying the publications <br /> Following the incorporation of comments from the City directly for the publications. The cost of <br /> and Caltrans the Draft EA will be prepared and advertisements is not included in this scope and cost. <br /> submitted for City and Caltrans review. Followingthis <br /> review the revised Draft EA will be prepared and Deliverables: <br /> submitted for City and Caltrans review. Following this Draftand Final NDA/NOPH (assumed to be <br /> review any comments will be addressed and a revision transmitted electronically with no hard copies) <br /> workshop will be conducted, if needed. Followingthe <br /> workshop the second revised Draft EA will be submitted Response to Comments <br /> to the City and Caltrans for concurrence and for the At the close of the public availability period for the Draft <br /> Caltrans NEPA QC review. Followingthe incorporation EA, ICF Jones & Stokes will review and respond to all <br /> of comments from the Caltrans NEPA QC review the comments received. In addition, ICF Jones & Stokes will <br /> final Draft EA will be submitted for Caltrans review and attend a meeting with City and Caltrans staff to review <br /> approval/concurrence. It is assumed that the project any written comments on the Draft EA that were <br /> will qualify as a regular and not a complex EA. It is received and to discuss potential responses to these <br /> assumed that 30 hard copies and one original of the comments, if the comments received warrant such a <br /> Final Draft EA will be printed for circulation, including meeting. The responses to comments will be forwarded <br /> the 15 copies to be submitted to the State to the City and Caltrans for review and approval priorto <br /> Clearinghouse. It is assumed that technical studies will making any changes to the EA, if the comments received <br /> be provided on CD only for inclusion with the documents are substantial enough to warrant this process. It is <br /> that are made available at the City, Caltrans, and the assumed that no comments requiring new analyses or <br /> local library. ICF Jones & Stokes will utilize a substantial revisions to existing analyses, or from <br /> distribution list developed with the City and Caltrans for lawyers, will be received. <br /> distribution. It is assumed that distribution to agencies <br /> will consist of a CD and not hard copies of the Deliverables (SCopiesJ: <br /> document. All other recipients would receive the Notice Responses to comments to the Cityand <br /> of Availability (NOA) only. The NOA will be mailed to Caltrans forreviewand concurrence <br /> property owners and residents living within 500 feet of <br /> the proposed project using a mailing list generated and <br /> provided by AECOM's right-of-way consultant or the <br /> City. U on a royal of the res onnes to comments b the Cit <br /> p pp p y Y <br /> and Caltrans, if warranted, ICF Jones & Stokes will <br /> Deliverables(two copies City; eight copies Caltrans): revise the EA to respond to the comments, to document <br /> • Screencheck EA Draft EA <br /> r~i f~, <br /> fr. ~~,.y~on, <br /> <br /> Ii:~ir~l~~s~l ~~r p:~r~Ue~~ t~~y Re~~~r~: ~;q~uiiv~~e~~: ire ~ I::' i p:~l~ins fair <br /> <br /> w,~~~ ir~~ Il~~l~v~ir~ r~~ e ~~~r~~~'i~n I~° r~"e~~~ <br /> ~ ~ ' <br />