Laserfiche WebLink
Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />No Substantial <br /> New Change from <br /> Significant More Severe Previous <br />Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Impacts Analysis <br />c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, E <br /> marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) either individually or in combination with <br /> the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, <br /> filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? <br />d) Interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or E <br /> wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife <br /> corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. <br />e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological F1 F <br /> resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance? <br />f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, <br /> Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or <br /> state habitat conservation plan? <br />V. Cu ltural Resources - Would the project: <br />a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical F] <br /> resource as defined in §15064.5? <br />b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique ? E] <br /> archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? <br />c) Directly or indirectly disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or E] ? <br /> site or unique geological feature? <br />d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal El ? <br /> cemeteries? <br />VI. Geology and Soils - Would the project: <br />a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, <br /> including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: <br /> i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent <br /> Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map issued by the State <br /> Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a <br /> known fault? <br /> ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ? El <br /> iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? ? 0 <br /> iv) Landslides? El El <br />b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ? n <br />c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become El 0 <br /> unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site <br /> landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? <br />d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform El <br /> Building Code (1994) creating substantial risks to life or property? <br />e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or ? El <br /> alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available <br /> for the disposal of waste water? <br />MacArthur Place South EIR - 2011 Addendum 53 <br />75B-97