Laserfiche WebLink
Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br /> No Substantial <br /> New Change from <br /> Significant More Severe Previous <br />Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Impacts Analysis <br />VII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Would the project: <br />a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may <br /> have a significant impact on the environment? <br />b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the <br /> purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? <br />VIII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials - Would the project: <br />a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the <br /> routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? <br />b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through <br /> reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release <br /> of hazardous materials into the environment. <br />c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous <br /> materials, substance or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or <br /> proposed school? <br />d) Be located on a site which is located on a list of hazardous materials sites <br /> compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, <br /> would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? <br />e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan <br /> has not been adopted, within two miles where of a public airport or public <br /> use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing <br /> or working in the project area? <br />Q For project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in <br /> a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? <br />g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency <br /> response plan or emergency evacuation plan? <br />h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death ? 1:1 M <br /> involving wild fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized <br /> areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? <br />IX. Hydrology and Water Quality -Would the project: <br />a) Violate any Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards <br /> or waste discharge requirements? <br />b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with ? <br /> groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer <br /> volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the <br /> production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which <br /> would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits <br /> have been granted)? <br />c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including El ? <br /> through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which <br /> would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site, or substantially <br /> increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would <br /> result in flooding on or off-site? <br />MacArthur Place South EIR - 2011 Addendum 54 <br />75B-98