Laserfiche WebLink
Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br /> No Substantial <br /> New Change from <br /> Significant More Severe Previous <br />Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Impacts Analysis <br />d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including <br /> through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially <br /> increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would <br /> result in flooding on or off-site? <br />e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of <br /> existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial <br /> additional sources of polluted run-off? <br />f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? <br />g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal <br /> Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard <br /> delineation map? <br />h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede <br /> or redirect flood flows? <br />i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death ? ? <br /> involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or <br /> dam. <br />j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? <br />X. Land Use and Planning - Would the project: <br />a) Physically divide an established community? <br />b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an <br /> agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the <br /> general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) <br /> adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? <br />c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community <br /> conservation plan? <br />XI. Mineral Resources - Would the project: <br />a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be ? El <br /> of value to the region and the residents of the state? <br />b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource ? El <br /> recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land <br /> use plan? <br />XII. Noise - Would the project result in: <br />a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards ? ? <br /> established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable <br /> standards of other agencies? <br />b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration ? <br /> or groundborne noise levels? <br />c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project ? ? <br /> vicinity above levels existing without the project? <br />d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the ? ? <br /> project vicinity above levels existing without project? <br />MacArthur Place South EIR - 2011 Addendum 55 <br />75B-99